140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22474644)
21. Accuracy of Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Natural and Simulated External Root Resorption.
Deliga Schröder ÂG; Westphalen FH; Schröder JC; Fernandes Â; Westphalen VPD
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 29884337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro comparison of cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes for detection of simulated external root resorption.
Neves FS; de Freitas DQ; Campos PS; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
J Oral Sci; 2012 Sep; 54(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 23047032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of simulated root resorption lacunas based on cone beam computed tomography.
Wang Y; He S; Guo Y; Wang S; Chen S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Aug; 16(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23419069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Observer ability to detect ex vivo simulated internal or external cervical root resorption.
Kamburoğlu K; Kurşun S; Yüksel S; Oztaş B
J Endod; 2011 Feb; 37(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 21238797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Could cone-beam computed tomography demonstrate the lateral accessory canals?
Ji Y; Wen S; Liu S; Zhu M; Yao M; Wang T; Lin Z
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):142. PubMed ID: 29187181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of linear and volumetric measurements of artificial ERR cavities by using CBCT images obtained at 4 different voxel sizes and measured by using 4 different software: an ex vivo research.
Sönmez G; Koç C; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20170325. PubMed ID: 29851352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption.
Madani Z; Moudi E; Bijani A; Mahmoudi E
Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 26843878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the Accuracy of CBCT Images and Apex Locator in Detection of External Root Resorption with Perforation.
Adibi A; Sobhnamayan F; Ostovar Zijerdi N; Tajik M; Paknahad M
J Dent (Shiraz); 2022 Dec; 23(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 36718169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of detecting vertical root fractures in non-root filled teeth using cone beam computed tomography: effect of voxel size and fracture width.
Guo XL; Li G; Zheng JQ; Ma RH; Liu FC; Yuan FS; Lyu PJ; Guo YJ; Yin S
Int Endod J; 2019 Jun; 52(6):887-898. PubMed ID: 30661246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic efficacy of different cone beam computed tomography scanning protocols in the detection of chemically simulated external root resorption.
Vieira HT; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira PF; Arús NA; Corrêa Travessas JA; da Silveira HLD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130(3):322-327. PubMed ID: 32423729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis.
Ponder SN; Benavides E; Kapila S; Hatch NE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23273363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosing complex endodontic pathoses using a gold standard reference - A prospective clinical study.
G K; Singh N; Yadav R; Duhan J; Tewari S; Gupta A; Sangwan P; Mittal S
Int Endod J; 2021 Sep; 54(9):1448-1461. PubMed ID: 33904603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study.
Shokri A; Mortazavi H; Salemi F; Javadian A; Bakhtiari H; Matlabi H
Biomed J; 2013; 36(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 23515150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: the influence of imaging modes and root canal materials.
Neves FS; Freitas DQ; Campos PS; Ekestubbe A; Lofthag-Hansen S
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1530-6. PubMed ID: 25127934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The ability of cone-beam computed tomography to detect simulated buccal and lingual recesses in root canals.
Liang YH; Yuan M; Li G; Shemesh H; Wesselink PR; Wu MK
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):724-9. PubMed ID: 22372870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of root resorption.
Lima TF; Gamba TO; Zaia AA; Soares AJ
Aust Dent J; 2016 Dec; 61(4):425-431. PubMed ID: 26780040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth.
Bastos JV; Queiroz VHF; FelÍcio DBA; Ferreira DAB; Brasileiro CB; Abdo EN; Amaral TMP
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e067. PubMed ID: 32696909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of different voxels and exposure parameters of CBCT for the assessment of external root resorptions: A phantom study.
Goller Bulut D; Uğur Aydın Z
Aust Endod J; 2019 Aug; 45(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 31267607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
