These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Makino Y; Yano M Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception. Prince SJ; Eagle RA Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Jul; 266(1426):1361-5. PubMed ID: 10445290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Depth magnitude from stereopsis: Assessment techniques and the role of experience. Hartle B; Wilcox LM Vision Res; 2016 Aug; 125():64-75. PubMed ID: 27369096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The contribution of vergence change to the measurement of relative disparity. Backus BT; Matza-Brown D J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):737-50. PubMed ID: 14765957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poor stereopsis can support size constancy in albinism. Cobo-Lewis AB; Siatkowski RM; Laviña AM; Marquez LC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Dec; 38(13):2800-9. PubMed ID: 9418733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seeing stereoscopic depth from disparity between kinetic edges. Poom L Perception; 2002; 31(12):1439-48. PubMed ID: 12916668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception. Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Configuration stereopsis: a new look at the depth-disparity relation. Richards W Spat Vis; 2009; 22(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 19055889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning. Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. Smallman HS; MacLeod DI J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Aug; 11(8):2169-83. PubMed ID: 7931758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Envelope size tuning for stereo-depth perception of small and large disparities. Schor CM; Edwards M; Sato M Vision Res; 2001 Sep; 41(20):2555-67. PubMed ID: 11520503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Associated phoria in relation to stereopsis with random-dot stereograms. Jiménez JR; Olivares JL; Pérez-Ocón F; del Barco LJ Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jan; 77(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10654858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereoscopic matching and the aperture problem. van Dam LC; van Ee R Perception; 2004; 33(7):769-87. PubMed ID: 15460506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant. Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disparity capture by flanking stimuli: a measure for the cooperative mechanism of stereopsis. Petrov Y Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 11927347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereopsis and aging. Norman JF; Norman HF; Craft AE; Walton CL; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL; Wiesemann EY; Crabtree CE Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]