These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22474935)

  • 1. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses.
    Tarib NA; Seong TW; Chuen KM; Kun MS; Ahmad M; Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22474935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
    Ongül D; Gökçen-Röhlig B; Şermet B; Keskin H
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Jun; 57(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 22624759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Cardoso A; Rocha EP; Gomes EA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels.
    Martínez-Rus F; García C; Santamaría A; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Jun; 22(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 23615660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part II: comparison of four acrylic resins.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 22208886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of three impression transfer techniques for implant supported prostheses.
    Dullabh HD; Sykes LM
    SADJ; 2008 Sep; 63(8):458, 460-2, 464-5. PubMed ID: 19055105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions.
    Humphries RM; Yaman P; Bloem TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 2094651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.