These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22474935)

  • 21. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations.
    Assunção WG; Britto RC; Ricardo Barão VA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 20386220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Vitro Implant Impression Accuracy Using a New Photopolymerizing SDR Splinting Material.
    Di Fiore A; Meneghello R; Savio G; Sivolella S; Katsoulis J; Stellini E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e721-9. PubMed ID: 25782045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part I: comparison of three direct methods.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 22066473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures.
    Herbst D; Nel JC; Driessen CH; Becker PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 May; 83(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 10793388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of four transfer impression techniques for dental implants: a scanning electron microscopic analysis.
    Yamamoto E; Marotti J; de Campos TT; Neto PT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1115-24. PubMed ID: 21197487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dimensional accuracy of different techniques used for complete-arch multi-implant impressions.
    Ghanem RA; Nassani MZ; Baroudi K; Abdel Fattah A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 Aug; 7(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 25944669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Kwon JH; Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 21640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of different implant impression splinting techniques and time on the dimensional accuracy: An in vitro study.
    Rutkunas V; Bilius V; Simonaitis T; Auskalnis L; Jurgilevicius J; Akulauskas M
    J Dent; 2022 Nov; 126():104267. PubMed ID: 36029970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.
    De La Cruz JE; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Moss ME; Graser GN; Tallents RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12426505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.