These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2247520)
1. The Court and Webster: ethics, politics, and abortion--a panel discussion. Gomez CF; Howard AE; Pinkerton J; Childress JF Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 2247520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Webster and the politics of abortion. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Congress settle the abortion issue? Segers MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster. Bannon AE; Nigro SA State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice". Grant ER Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Introduction: did the amici effort make a difference? Kolbert K Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 2603857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants. Blaustein AP Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Religion, politics, and abortion. Perry MJ Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 16538743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The convergence of abortion regulation in Germany and the United States: a critique of Glendon's Rights Talk thesis. Werner U Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1996 Jun; 18(3):571-602. PubMed ID: 11936151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The battle over abortion. Salholz E Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The America we seek: a statement of pro-life principle and concern. Agee MC; Argue D; Arkes H First Things; 1996 May; 63():40-4. PubMed ID: 11654353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade. Lockhart T Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can Congress create people? Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]