These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2247717)

  • 1. A note on point estimation of the hazard ratio in exponential distributions.
    Lui KJ; Rhodes P
    Stat Med; 1990 Oct; 9(10):1167-73. PubMed ID: 2247717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of treatment effect under non-proportional hazards and conditionally independent censoring.
    Boyd AP; Kittelson JM; Gillen DL
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3504-15. PubMed ID: 22763957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of secondary endpoints in two-stage phase II oncology trials.
    Kunz CU; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4352-68. PubMed ID: 22930470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hazard rate estimation under random censoring with varying kernels and bandwidths.
    Müller HG; Wang JL
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 8086616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the log-normal mean.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2251-64. PubMed ID: 9802182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimax Estimation of Functionals of Discrete Distributions.
    Jiao J; Venkat K; Han Y; Weissman T
    IEEE Trans Inf Theory; 2015 May; 61(5):2835-2885. PubMed ID: 29375152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the estimation of the binomial probability in multistage clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Kim KM
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):881-96. PubMed ID: 15027078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What inference for two-stage phase II trials?
    Porcher R; Desseaux K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():117. PubMed ID: 22867439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different parametric proportional hazards models for interval-censored data: a simulation study.
    Gong Q; Fang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 23916917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of a change point in a hazard function based on censored data.
    Gijbels I; Gürler U
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2003 Dec; 9(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 15000412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the small-sample performance of Efron's and of Gill's version of the product limit estimator under nonproportional hazards.
    Geurts JH
    Biometrics; 1987 Sep; 43(3):683-92. PubMed ID: 3663824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
    Cousineau D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonparametric estimation of time-to-event distribution based on recall data in observational studies.
    Mirzaei Salehabadi S; Sengupta D
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Oct; 22(4):473-503. PubMed ID: 26391480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation study of finite-sample properties of marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models.
    Westreich D; Cole SR; Schisterman EF; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2098-109. PubMed ID: 22492660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing sample size formulae for trials with unbalanced allocation using the logrank test.
    Hsieh FY
    Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(8):1091-8. PubMed ID: 1496196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymptotically robust variance estimation for person-time incidence rates.
    Scosyrev E
    Biom J; 2016 May; 58(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 26439107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating survival curves with left-truncated and interval-censored data under monotone hazards.
    Pan W; Chappell R
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1053-60. PubMed ID: 9750251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Best linear unbiased allele-frequency estimation in complex pedigrees.
    McPeek MS; Wu X; Ober C
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 15180661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bias of the sample proportion following a group sequential phase II clinical trial.
    Chang MN; Wieand HS; Chang VT
    Stat Med; 1989 May; 8(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 2727475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.