These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22477392)

  • 1. A six-year study of diagnostic lower extremity imaging practice patterns and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs health care system.
    Scranton RE; Dhingra R; Lawler EV; Yucel K; Guo A; Chittamooru SP; Gagnon DR; Hay JW; Gaziano JM
    Int J Angiol; 2008; 17(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 22477392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost impact of diagnostic imaging for lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease.
    Hay JW; Lawler E; Yucel K; Guo A; Balzer T; Gaziano JM; Scranton RE
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18657093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arterial imaging in patients with lower extremity ischemia and diabetes mellitus.
    Pomposelli F
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):81S-91S. PubMed ID: 20804938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): preliminary results in vascular occlusive disease of the abdominal and lower-extremity arteries.
    Krug B; Kugel H; Harnischmacher U; Heindel W; Fischbach R; Altenburg A; Krings F
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 19(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 7713092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective feasibility study of duplex ultrasound arterial mapping, digital-subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in management of critical lower limb ischemia by endovascular revascularization.
    Lowery AJ; Hynes N; Manning BJ; Mahendran M; Tawfik S; Sultan S
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Jul; 21(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 17628263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
    Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
    MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of auto-moving table contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA and iodinated contrast-enhanced DSA for evaluating the lower-extremity arteries.
    Ho CF; Wu MH; Wu HM; Chang CY; Chen MC; Chou TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2004 Oct; 67(10):511-20. PubMed ID: 15648286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The costs and effects of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital substraction angiography on quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Bosma J; Dijksman LM; Lam K; Wisselink W; van Swijndregt AD; Vahl A
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 23939383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomised controlled diagnostic trial.
    Vahl AC; Geselschap J; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Smit J; Sala J; Turkcan K; Dijksman LM; Visser MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 May; 35(5):514-21; discussion 522-3. PubMed ID: 18201915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance angiography or digital subtraction catheter angiography for follow-up of coiled aneurysms: do we need both?
    Lane A; Vivian P; Coulthard A
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25857748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of contrast-enhanced multi-station MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity arterial disease.
    Burbelko M; Augsten M; Kalinowski MO; Heverhagen JT
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1427-35. PubMed ID: 23188773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pedal artery imaging--a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound.
    Hofmann WJ; Forstner R; Kofler B; Binder K; Ugurluoglu A; Magometschnigg H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 24(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 12323169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of noninvasive neurovascular imaging modalities in stroke patients: patterns of use and impact on need for digital subtraction angiography.
    Hassan AE; Rostambeigi N; Chaudhry SA; Khan AA; Zacharatos H; Khatri R; Uzun G; Qureshi AI
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013 Oct; 22(7):e53-8. PubMed ID: 22578916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hoch JR; Kennell TW; Hollister MS; Sproat IA; Swan JS; Acher CW; Burks J; Heisey DM
    Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10487272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.