425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22479636)
21. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match.
Deagle BE; Jarman SN; Coissac E; Pompanon F; Taberlet P
Biol Lett; 2014 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 25209199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Meeting the challenge of DNA barcoding Neotropical amphibians: polymerase chain reaction optimization and new COI primers.
Lyra ML; Haddad CFB; de Azeredo-Espin AML
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):966-980. PubMed ID: 28029226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating ethanol-based sample preservation to facilitate use of DNA barcoding in routine freshwater biomonitoring programs using benthic macroinvertebrates.
Stein ED; White BP; Mazor RD; Miller PE; Pilgrim EM
PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e51273. PubMed ID: 23308097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New 12S metabarcoding primers for enhanced Neotropical freshwater fish biodiversity assessment.
Milan DT; Mendes IS; Damasceno JS; Teixeira DF; Sales NG; Carvalho DC
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17966. PubMed ID: 33087755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA barcoding of shrimps from a mangrove biodiversity hotspot.
Jamaluddin JAF; Mohammed Akib NA; Ahmad SZ; Abdul Halim SAA; Abdul Hamid NK; Mohd Nor SA
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal; 2019 May; 30(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 31012766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA barcoding for identification of fish species in the Taiwan Strait.
Bingpeng X; Heshan L; Zhilan Z; Chunguang W; Yanguo W; Jianjun W
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198109. PubMed ID: 29856794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DNA barcode and minibarcode identification of freshwater fishes from Cerrado headwater streams in Central Brazil.
Bagley JC; de Aquino PPU; Breitman MF; Langeani F; Colli GR
J Fish Biol; 2019 Oct; 95(4):1046-1060. PubMed ID: 31304599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar
Lopez-Vaamonde C; Sire L; Rasmussen B; Rougerie R; Wieser C; Allaoui AA; Minet J; deWaard JR; Decaëns T; Lees DC
Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):108-121. PubMed ID: 30184444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the effectiveness of mitochondrial COI and 16S rRNA genes for DNA barcoding of farmland spiders in China.
Wang ZL; Yang XQ; Wang TZ; Yu X
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal; 2018 Jul; 29(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 28712321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) metabarcoding of Foraminifera communities using taxon-specific primers.
Macher JN; Bloska DM; Holzmann M; Girard EB; Pawlowski J; Renema W
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13952. PubMed ID: 36093332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DNA barcodes discriminate freshwater fishes from the Paraíba do Sul River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pereira LH; Maia GM; Hanner R; Foresti F; Oliveira C
Mitochondrial DNA; 2011 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():71-9. PubMed ID: 21271849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Identifying the true oysters (Bivalvia: Ostreidae) with mitochondrial phylogeny and distance-based DNA barcoding.
Liu J; Li Q; Kong L; Yu H; Zheng X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Sep; 11(5):820-30. PubMed ID: 21592313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of snake DNA barcodes based on mitochondrial COI and Cytb genes revealed multiple putative cryptic species in Thailand.
Laopichienpong N; Muangmai N; Supikamolseni A; Twilprawat P; Chanhome L; Suntrarachun S; Peyachoknagul S; Srikulnath K
Gene; 2016 Dec; 594(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 27632899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Limited efficiency of universal mini-barcode primers for DNA amplification from desert reptiles, birds and mammals.
Arif IA; Khan HA; Al Sadoon M; Shobrak M
Genet Mol Res; 2011 Oct; 10(4):3559-64. PubMed ID: 22057991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DNA barcode reference data for the Korean herpetofauna and their applications.
Jeong TJ; Jun J; Han S; Kim HT; Oh K; Kwak M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Nov; 13(6):1019-32. PubMed ID: 23311467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA barcoding commercially important aquatic invertebrates of Turkey.
Keskin E; Atar HH
Mitochondrial DNA; 2013 Aug; 24(4):440-50. PubMed ID: 23387292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance comparison of genetic markers for high-throughput sequencing-based biodiversity assessment in complex communities.
Zhan A; Bailey SA; Heath DD; Macisaac HJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Sep; 14(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 24655333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. DNA barcoding using skin exuviates can improve identification and biodiversity studies of snakes.
Khedkar T; Sharma R; Tiknaik A; Khedkar G; Naikwade BS; Ron TB; Haymer D
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal; 2016; 27(1):499-507. PubMed ID: 24724934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Utility of DNA barcoding in distinguishing species of the family Taeniidae.
Zhang G; Chen J; Yang Y; Liu N; Jiang W; Gu S; Wang X; Wang Z
J Parasitol; 2014 Aug; 100(4):542-6. PubMed ID: 24611571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
