These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22479817)

  • 1. GemAffinity: a scoring function for predicting binding affinity and virtual screening.
    Hsu KC; Chen YF; Yang JM
    Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2012; 6(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 22479817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
    Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.
    Wang R; Lai L; Wang S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Jan; 16(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 12197663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Descriptor Data Bank (DDB): A Cloud Platform for Multiperspective Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):134-147. PubMed ID: 29186950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Definition and display of steric, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bonding properties of ligand binding sites in proteins using Lee and Richards accessible surface: validation of a high-resolution graphical tool for drug design.
    Bohacek RS; McMartin C
    J Med Chem; 1992 May; 35(10):1671-84. PubMed ID: 1588550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MedusaScore: an accurate force field-based scoring function for virtual drug screening.
    Yin S; Biedermannova L; Vondrasek J; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1656-62. PubMed ID: 18672869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
    Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binding affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes based on β contacts and B factor.
    Liu Q; Kwoh CK; Li J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3076-85. PubMed ID: 24191692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AA-Score: a New Scoring Function Based on Amino Acid-Specific Interaction for Molecular Docking.
    Pan X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Wang X; Li C; Ji C; Zhang JZH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 May; 62(10):2499-2509. PubMed ID: 35452230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distance dependent scoring function for describing protein-ligand intermolecular interactions.
    Artemenko N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18290639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Van der Waals Potential in Protein Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():79-91. PubMed ID: 31452100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AutoMap: a tool for analyzing protein-ligand recognition using multiple ligand binding modes.
    Agostino M; Mancera RL; Ramsland PA; Yuriev E
    J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Mar; 40():80-90. PubMed ID: 23376613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein-ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening.
    Zavodszky MI; Sanschagrin PC; Korde RS; Kuhn LA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Dec; 16(12):883-902. PubMed ID: 12825621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ligand Identification Scoring Algorithm (LISA).
    Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1296-306. PubMed ID: 21561101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a New Scoring Function for Virtual Screening: APBScore.
    Bao J; He X; Zhang JZH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6355-6365. PubMed ID: 33052694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational methods for calculation of ligand-binding affinity.
    de Azevedo WF; Dias R
    Curr Drug Targets; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1031-9. PubMed ID: 19128212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PRL-Dock: protein-ligand docking based on hydrogen bond matching and probabilistic relaxation labeling.
    Wu MY; Dai DQ; Yan H
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(9):2137-53. PubMed ID: 22544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.