These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22480269)

  • 1. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area.
    Garcia J; Marrufo OR; Rodriguez AO; Larose E; Pibarot P; Kadem L
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Apr; 14(1):23. PubMed ID: 22480269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using 4D flow jet shear layer detection for the measurement of valve effective orifice area.
    Garcia J; Markl M; Schnell S; Allen B; Entezari P; Mahadevia R; Chris Malaisrie S; Pibarot P; Carr J; Barker AJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):891-8. PubMed ID: 24865143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity.
    Garcia J; Capoulade R; Le Ven F; Gaillard E; Kadem L; Pibarot P; Larose É
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Sep; 15(1):84. PubMed ID: 24053194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the Haemodynamic Streamline Vena Contracta as the Effective Orifice Area Measured from Reconstructed Multislice Phase-contrast MR Images for Patients with Moderately Accelerated Aortic Stenosis.
    Hohri Y; Itatani K; Matsuo A; Komori Y; Okamoto T; Goto T; Kobayashi T; Hiramatsu T; Miyazaki S; Nishino T; Yaku H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 21(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 34334586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of aortic stenosis diagnostic parameters: comparison of fast 3 direction and 1 direction phase contrast CMR and transthoracic echocardiography.
    da Silveira JS; Smyke M; Rich AV; Liu Y; Jin N; Scandling D; Dickerson JA; Rochitte CE; Raman SV; Potter LC; Ahmad R; Simonetti OP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):35. PubMed ID: 28270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simplified continuity equation approach to the quantification of stenotic bicuspid aortic valves using velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Yap SC; van Geuns RJ; Meijboom FJ; Kirschbaum SW; McGhie JS; Simoons ML; Kilner PJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 18066750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.
    Mantini C; Di Giammarco G; Pizzicannella J; Gallina S; Ricci F; D'Ugo E; Marchetti M; Cotroneo AR; Ahmed N; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Tartaro A; De Caterina R
    Radiol Med; 2018 Sep; 123(9):643-654. PubMed ID: 29730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orifice Areas of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves: A Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Study.
    Watson RA; Vishnevsky A; Dikdan S; Marcantuono R; Decaro M; Goldhammer J; Entwistle JWC; Ruggiero N; Mehrotra P
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 May; 35(5):460-468. PubMed ID: 34954049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of valve opening and closing kinetics in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J; Pibarot P; Capoulade R; Le Ven F; Kadem L; Larose E
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Aug; 14(8):819-26. PubMed ID: 23299400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Troger F; Lechner I; Reindl M; Tiller C; Holzknecht M; Pamminger M; Kremser C; Schwaiger J; Reinstadler SJ; Bauer A; Metzler B; Mayr A; Klug G
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 34986847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic stenosis assessment from the 3-chamber cine: Ratio of balanced steady-state-free-precession (bSSFP) blood signal between the aorta and left ventricle predicts severity.
    Vimalesvaran K; Zaman S; Howard JP; Aziminia N; Giannoudi M; Procter H; Varela M; Uslu F; Ariff B; Linton N; Levelt E; Bharath AA; Cole GD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024; 26(1):100005. PubMed ID: 38211656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
    Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.