148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22480781)
1. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: survival and the affect of age and gender.
Matharu G; Robb C; Baloch K; Pynsent P
Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 22480781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases.
Pandit H; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21282759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: similar to a primary?
Wynn Jones H; Chan W; Harrison T; Smith TO; Masonda P; Walton NP
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 21531140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobile-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford domed tibial component: an independent series.
Streit MR; Walker T; Bruckner T; Merle C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M; Aldinger PR; Gotterbarm T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Oct; 94(10):1356-61. PubMed ID: 23015560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Newman J; Pydisetty RV; Ackroyd C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19092004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the minimally invasive technique in patients aged 60 and above: an independent prospective series.
Kort NP; van Raay JJ; Cheung J; Jolink C; Deutman R
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2007 Nov; 15(11):1331-4. PubMed ID: 17684726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mid-term effectiveness of Oxford Unicompartmental Knee System Phase III for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis].
Tang H; Zhao L; Yan H; Jin D; Su X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 26(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 22332511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!
Luscombe KL; Lim J; Jones PW; White SH
Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 16896865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.
Pandit H; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Smith G; Price AJ; Dodd CA; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 May; 93(5):622-8. PubMed ID: 21511927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study.
Saldanha KA; Keys GW; Svard UC; White SH; Rao C
Knee; 2007 Aug; 14(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 17524650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a report from an independent centre.
Kang SN; Smith TO; Sprenger De Rover WB; Walton NP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Apr; 93(4):476-8. PubMed ID: 21464485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does activity affect the outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement?
Ali AM; Pandit H; Liddle AD; Jenkins C; Mellon S; Dodd CA; Murray DW
Knee; 2016 Mar; 23(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 26758852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment knee disease: 2 to 5 year follow-up.
Heller S; Fenichel I; Salai M; Luria T; Velkes S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 May; 11(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 19637502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: Early results from an independent center using the Oxford fixed lateral prosthesis.
Walker T; Hariri M; Eckert J; Panzram B; Reiner T; Merle C; Gotterbarm T; Moradi B
Knee; 2020 Jan; 27(1):235-241. PubMed ID: 31806510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement in Korean patients.
Lim HC; Bae JH; Song SH; Kim SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1071-6. PubMed ID: 22844048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment.
Pandit H; Gulati A; Jenkins C; Barker K; Price AJ; Dodd CA; Murray DW
Knee; 2011 Jun; 18(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 20627734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medium-term results of Oxford phase-3 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Clement ND; Duckworth AD; MacKenzie SP; Nie YX; Tiemessen CH
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2012 Aug; 20(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 22933670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and technical factors influencing outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Retrospective multicentre study of 944 knees.
Sébilo A; Casin C; Lebel B; Rouvillain JL; Chapuis S; Bonnevialle P;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Jun; 99(4 Suppl):S227-34. PubMed ID: 23623316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].
Endres S; Steinheiser E; Wilke A
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 16224679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an independent 10-year survival study.
Zermatten P; Munzinger U
Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Apr; 78(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 22696991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]