These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22480781)

  • 21. Does body mass index affect the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement?
    Murray DW; Pandit H; Weston-Simons JS; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Lombardi AV; Dodd CA; Berend KR
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 23110877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of gender on outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Lustig S; Barba N; Magnussen RA; Servien E; Demey G; Neyret P
    Knee; 2012 Jun; 19(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 21440443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs.
    Pandit H; Hamilton TW; Jenkins C; Mellon SJ; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1493-500. PubMed ID: 26530651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an intermediate report of survivorship after the introduction of a new system with analysis of failures.
    Jeer PJ; Keene GC; Gill P
    Knee; 2004 Oct; 11(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 15351411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: factors influencing the outcome.
    Xing Z; Katz J; Jiranek W
    J Knee Surg; 2012 Nov; 25(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 23150345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The cemented twin-peg Oxford partial knee replacement survivorship: a cohort study.
    White SH; Roberts S; Kuiper JH
    Knee; 2015 Sep; 22(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 26003214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medial UKA: favorable mid-term results in middle-aged patients.
    Dalury D; Kelley TC; Adams MJ
    J Knee Surg; 2013 Apr; 26(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 23288757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged.
    Heyse TJ; Khefacha A; Peersman G; Cartier P
    Knee; 2012 Oct; 19(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 21962908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach.
    Pandit H; Jenkins C; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16365121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
    Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No difference in quality-of-life outcomes after mobile and fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement.
    Biau DJ; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Masri BA
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Feb; 28(2):220-226.e1. PubMed ID: 22770856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry.
    Pearse AJ; Hooper GJ; Rothwell A; Frampton C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20357326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years.
    Hooper G; Rothwell A; Frampton C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19092005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fixed lateral unicompartmental knee replacement is a reliable treatment for lateral compartment osteoarthritis after mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental replacement.
    Lazzara JT; Arthur LW; Jenkins C; Dodd CAF; Mellon SJ; Murray DW
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5407-5412. PubMed ID: 37768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: literature review.
    Khanna G; Levy BA
    Orthopedics; 2007 May; 30(5 Suppl):11-4. PubMed ID: 17549859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Histology of the bone-cement interface in retrieved Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.
    Kendrick BJ; James AR; Pandit H; Gill HS; Price AJ; Blunn GW; Murray DW
    Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):918-22. PubMed ID: 22542361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age.
    Price AJ; Dodd CA; Svard UG; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Nov; 87(11):1488-92. PubMed ID: 16260664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement.
    Chou DT; Swamy GN; Lewis JR; Badhe NP
    Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 21636281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cementless medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Five-year results from an independent series.
    Hefny MH; Smith NA; Waite J
    Knee; 2020 Aug; 27(4):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32711885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome.
    Robb CA; Matharu GS; Baloch K; Pynsent PB
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Jun; 79(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 23926735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.