BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22480944)

  • 1. Theoretical and experimental characterisation of magnetic microbubbles.
    Mulvana H; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX; Pankhurst Q; Stride E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):864-75. PubMed ID: 22480944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior.
    Chien CT; Burns PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Mar; 51(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 15128215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study on the multiple scattering effects of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Chen J; Zhu Z
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e115-8. PubMed ID: 16854444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of binding on the subharmonic emissions from individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz.
    Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 39(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 23219039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dual-frequency excitation technique for enhancing the sub-harmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles.
    Zhang D; Xi X; Zhang Z; Gong X; Chen G; Wu J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4257-72. PubMed ID: 19531846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of acoustic transmit parameters on the destruction of contrast microbubbles in vitro.
    Shi WT; Forsberg F; Vaidyanathan P; Tornes A; Ă˜stensen J; Goldberg BB
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4031-45. PubMed ID: 16885622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling photothermal and acoustical induced microbubble generation and growth.
    Krasovitski B; Kislev H; Kimmel E
    Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):90-101. PubMed ID: 17910969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
    Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of acoustic droplet vaporization for control of bubble generation under flow conditions.
    Kang ST; Huang YL; Yeh CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):551-61. PubMed ID: 24433748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
    Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancement of microbubble mediated gene delivery by simultaneous exposure to ultrasonic and magnetic fields.
    Stride E; Porter C; Prieto AG; Pankhurst Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):861-8. PubMed ID: 19282096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High frequency attenuation measurements of lipid encapsulated contrast agents.
    Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; Voormolen MM; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e131-4. PubMed ID: 16843511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-particle optical sizing of microbubbles.
    Satinover SJ; Dove JD; Borden MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 24139917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radial modulation of single microbubbles.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; Versluis M; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2370-9. PubMed ID: 19942524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference frequency and its harmonic emitted by microbubbles under dual frequency excitation.
    Chen S; Kinnick R; Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e123-6. PubMed ID: 16930662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concomitance in single bubble sonoluminescence of period doubling in emission and shape distortion.
    Levinsen MT
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):637-43. PubMed ID: 24074749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging.
    Tang MX; Eckersley RJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Dec; 53(12):2406-15. PubMed ID: 17186923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
    Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of ultrasound on adherent microbubble contrast agents.
    Loughran J; Sennoga C; J Eckersley R; Tang MX
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6999-7014. PubMed ID: 23044731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The onset of microbubble vibration.
    Emmer M; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):941-9. PubMed ID: 17451868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.