BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22481180)

  • 21. Arsenic release from flooded paddy soils is influenced by speciation, Eh, pH, and iron dissolution.
    Yamaguchi N; Nakamura T; Dong D; Takahashi Y; Amachi S; Makino T
    Chemosphere; 2011 May; 83(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 21420713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Leaching of arsenic, copper and chromium from thermally treated soil.
    Kumpiene J; Nordmark D; Hamberg R; Carabante I; Simanavičienė R; Aksamitauskas VČ
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):460-466. PubMed ID: 27612616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of various chemical extraction methods to estimate plant-available arsenic in mine soils.
    Anawar HM; Garcia-Sanchez A; Santa Regina I
    Chemosphere; 2008 Feb; 70(8):1459-67. PubMed ID: 17936872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Organic Amendments to Enhance Growth of Macaranga peltata (Roxb.) Müll. Arg. in Iron Ore Mine Wastelands.
    Rodrigues CR; Rodrigues BF
    Int J Phytoremediation; 2015; 17(1-6):485-92. PubMed ID: 25495939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Arsenic fractionation in agricultural acid soils from NW Spain using a sequential extraction procedure.
    Nóvoa-Muñoz JC; Queijeiro JM; Blanco-Ward D; Alvarez-Olleros C; García-Rodeja E; Martínez-Cortizas A
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 May; 378(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 17289117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of zerovalent iron for stabilization of chromium, copper, and arsenic in soil.
    Kumpiene J; Ore S; Renella G; Mench M; Lagerkvist A; Maurice C
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Nov; 144(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 16517035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Geochemical assessments and classification of coal mine spoils for better understanding of potential salinity issues at closure.
    Park JH; Li X; Edraki M; Baumgartl T; Kirsch B
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Jun; 15(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 23644772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Remediation of metal polluted mine soil with compost: co-composting versus incorporation.
    Tandy S; Healey JR; Nason MA; Williamson JC; Jones DL
    Environ Pollut; 2009 Feb; 157(2):690-7. PubMed ID: 18819736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The fate of arsenic in soil-plant systems.
    Moreno-Jiménez E; Esteban E; Peñalosa JM
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012; 215():1-37. PubMed ID: 22057929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of fly ash-aided phytostabilisation of highly contaminated soils after an 8-year field trial Part 2. Influence on plants.
    Pourrut B; Lopareva-Pohu A; Pruvot C; Garçon G; Verdin A; Waterlot C; Bidar G; Shirali P; Douay F
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Oct; 409(21):4504-10. PubMed ID: 21871650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanisms of arsenic attenuation in acid mine drainage from Mount Bischoff, western Tasmania.
    Gault AG; Cooke DR; Townsend AT; Charnock JM; Polya DA
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jun; 345(1-3):219-28. PubMed ID: 15919541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mine spoil acts as a sink of carbon dioxide in Indian dry tropical environment.
    Tripathi N; Singh RS; Nathanail CP
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 468-469():1162-71. PubMed ID: 24184491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Groundwater derived arsenic in high carbonate wetland soils: sources, sinks, and mobility.
    Bauer M; Fulda B; Blodau C
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 401(1-3):109-20. PubMed ID: 18495216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An approach for arsenic in a contaminated soil: speciation, fractionation, extraction and effluent decontamination.
    Giacomino A; Malandrino M; Abollino O; Velayutham M; Chinnathangavel T; Mentasti E
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Feb; 158(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 19783338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of amendments on re-acidification and heavy metal immobilization in an extremely acidic mine soil.
    Yang SX; Li JT; Yang B; Liao B; Zhang JT; Shu WS
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Jul; 13(7):1876-83. PubMed ID: 21607275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterization of As-polluted soils by laboratory X-ray-based techniques coupled with sequential extractions and electron microscopy: the case of Crocette gold mine in the Monte Rosa mining district (Italy).
    Allegretta I; Porfido C; Martin M; Barberis E; Terzano R; Spagnuolo M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25080-25090. PubMed ID: 29936615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sequential soil washing techniques using hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide for remediating arsenic-contaminated soils in abandoned iron-ore mines.
    Jang M; Hwang JS; Choi SI
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 16831457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the potential of indigenous calcareous shale for neutralization and removal of arsenic and heavy metals from acid mine drainage in the Taxco mining area, Mexico.
    Romero FM; Núñez L; Gutiérrez ME; Armienta MA; Ceniceros-Gómez AE
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Feb; 60(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 20523977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temperature dependence and coupling of iron and arsenic reduction and release during flooding of a contaminated soil.
    Weber FA; Hofacker AF; Voegelin A; Kretzschmar R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 20039741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
    Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.