159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22481182)
1. The past, present, and future of the debate over return of research results and incidental findings.
Wolf SM
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 22481182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Return of results: not that complicated?
Evans JP; Rothschild BB
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):358-60. PubMed ID: 22481183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?
Fisher R
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 22361901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Taking aims seriously: repository research and limits on the duty to return individual research findings.
Ossorio P
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 22402758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidental findings in human subjects research: what do investigators owe research participants?
Miller FG; Mello MM; Joffe S
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):271-9, 211. PubMed ID: 18547194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secondary researchers' duties to return incidental findings and individual research results: a partial-entrustment account.
Richardson HS; Cho MK
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 22361900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Clayton EW; McGuire AL
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 22323070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidental findings: a common law approach.
Tovino SA
Account Res; 2008; 15(4):242-61. PubMed ID: 18972265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To know or not to know.
Ballantyne C
Nat Med; 2008 Aug; 14(8):797. PubMed ID: 18685585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping the inputs, analyses, and outputs of biobank research systems to identify sources of incidental findings and individual research results for potential return to participants.
Bemmels HR; Wolf SM; Van Ness B
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 22382801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
Wolf SM; Paradise J; Caga-anan C
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):361-83, 214. PubMed ID: 18547206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project.
Biesecker LG
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 22344227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. International normative perspectives on the return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks.
Zawati MH; Knoppers BM
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):484-9. PubMed ID: 22344229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results.
Bledsoe MJ; Grizzle WE; Clark BJ; Zeps N
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 22323073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No sex please in sexuality research.
Haire B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):43-4. PubMed ID: 20582830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reframing the ethical debate regarding incidental findings in genetic research.
Garrett JR
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):44-6. PubMed ID: 23391061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.
Clayton EW
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):286-91, 212. PubMed ID: 18547196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.
Beskow LM; Burke W; Fullerton SM; Sharp RR
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 22261761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Nirvana fallacy and the return of results.
Biesecker LG
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 23391060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research malpractice and the issue of incidental findings.
Milstein AC
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):356-60, 214. PubMed ID: 18547205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
