These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2248253)

  • 1. California's Proposition 65: extrapolating animal toxicity to humans.
    Kilgore WW
    Am J Ind Med; 1990; 18(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 2248253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk assessment for carcinogens under California's Proposition 65.
    Pease WS; Zeise L; Kelter A
    Risk Anal; 1990 Jun; 10(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 2367711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound science in the implementation of public policy. A case report on California's Proposition 65.
    Kizer KW; Warriner TE; Book SA
    JAMA; 1988 Aug; 260(7):951-5. PubMed ID: 3398200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An adaptive, comprehensive monitoring strategy for chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) in California's Aquatic Ecosystems.
    Maruya KA; Schlenk D; Anderson PD; Denslow ND; Drewes JE; Olivieri AW; Scott GI; Snyder SA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24129960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemical contamination of California drinking water.
    Russell HH; Jackson RJ; Spath DP; Book SA
    West J Med; 1987 Nov; 147(5):615-22. PubMed ID: 3321714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Current aspects of environmental protection from pollution by chemical carcinogens].
    Beliaev II
    Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR; 1982; (10):23-7. PubMed ID: 7180154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criteria for identifying and listing substances known to cause developmental toxicity under California's Proposition 65.
    Mattison DR; Hanson JW; Kochhar DM; Rao KS
    Reprod Toxicol; 1989; 3(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 2520504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. California's proposition 65: a reply.
    Book SA
    Science; 1987 Dec; 238(4834):1635. PubMed ID: 3685998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carbon trading, co-pollutants, and environmental equity: Evidence from California's cap-and-trade program (2011-2015).
    Cushing L; Blaustein-Rejto D; Wander M; Pastor M; Sadd J; Zhu A; Morello-Frosch R
    PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002604. PubMed ID: 29990353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proposition 65 in the dental office.
    Pichay TJ; Seifert LJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 29(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 11490690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental regulatory and policy framework in China: an overview.
    Zhang SQ
    J Environ Sci (China); 2001 Jan; 13(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 11590713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human embryonic stem cell research and Proposition 71. Reflections on California’s response to federal policy.
    Burgin E
    Politics Life Sci; 2010 Sep; 29(2):73-95. PubMed ID: 21761982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulatory Modeling of Pesticide Aquatic Exposures in California's Agricultural Receiving Waters.
    Xie Y; Luo Y; Singhasemanon N; Goh KS
    J Environ Qual; 2018 Nov; 47(6):1453-1461. PubMed ID: 30512076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Educated guesses: health risk assessment in environmental impact statements.
    Harvey PD
    Am J Law Med; 1990; 16(3):399-427. PubMed ID: 2278245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the regulation of carcinogens by expediting cancer potency estimation.
    Hoover SM; Zeise L; Pease WS; Lee LE; Hennig MP; Weiss LB; Cranor C
    Risk Anal; 1995 Apr; 15(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 7597261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental policy, legislation and management of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in China.
    Lau MH; Leung KM; Wong SW; Wang H; Yan ZG
    Environ Pollut; 2012 Jun; 165():182-92. PubMed ID: 22285063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental amalgam: regulating its use and disposal.
    Pichay TJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):580-2. PubMed ID: 15468539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative hierarchical decision framework on toxics use reduction effectiveness for electronic and electrical industries.
    Kang HY; Ogunseitan O; Shapiro AA; Schoenung JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 17310694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Krimsky S
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2002404. PubMed ID: 29252997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of California Public Health Goals (PHGs) for chemicals in drinking water.
    Howd RA; Brown JP; Morry DW; Wang YY; Bankowska J; Budroe JD; Campbell M; DiBartolomeis MJ; Faust J; Jowa L; Lewis D; Parker T; Polakoff J; Rice DW; Salmon AG; Tomar RS; Fan AM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11139167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.