BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

708 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22482599)

  • 21. Target motion predictions for pre-operative planning during needle-based interventions.
    op den Buijs J; Abayazid M; de Korte CL; Misra S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5380-5. PubMed ID: 22255554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing.
    Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization of biomechanical properties of agar based tissue mimicking phantoms for ultrasound stiffness imaging techniques.
    Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():132-43. PubMed ID: 24769915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for testing elastography systems.
    Madsen EL; Hobson MA; Frank GR; Shi H; Jiang J; Hall TJ; Varghese T; Doyley MM; Weaver JB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):857-74. PubMed ID: 16785008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic frame pairing in real-time freehand elastography.
    Xia R; Tao G; Thittai AK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):979-85. PubMed ID: 24859661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. X-ray strain tensor imaging: FEM simulation and experiments with a micro-CT.
    Kim JG; Park SE; Lee SY
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 24463386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging on an Automated Breast Volume Scanning System.
    Wang Y; Nasief HG; Kohn S; Milkowski A; Clary T; Barnes S; Barbone PE; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 Nov; 39(6):369-392. PubMed ID: 28585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of Eshelby's Solution to Elastography for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
    Shin B; Gopaul D; Fienberg S; Kwon HJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2016 Mar; 38(2):115-36. PubMed ID: 25761705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography.
    Doyley MM; Srinivasan S; Pendergrass SA; Wu Z; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):787-802. PubMed ID: 15936495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting target displacements using ultrasound elastography and finite element modeling.
    op den Buijs J; Hansen HH; Lopata RG; de Korte CL; Misra S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3143-55. PubMed ID: 21846601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improvement of displacement estimation of breast tissue in ultrasound elastography using the monogenic signal.
    Slimi T; Moussa IM; Kraiem T; Mahjoubi H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jan; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 28095866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A class of kernel based real-time elastography algorithms.
    Kibria MG; Hasan MK
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Aug; 61():88-102. PubMed ID: 25929595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding the Contrast Mechanism in Rotation Elastogram: A Parametric Study.
    Lokesh B; Ten Dam AM; de Korte CL; Thittai AK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1860-1872. PubMed ID: 29801975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strain Elastography of Breast and Prostata Cancer: Similarities and Differences.
    Daniaux M; Auer T; De Zordo T; Junker D; Santner W; Hubalek M; Jaschke W; Aigner F
    Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 26529265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High-quality model generation for finite element simulation of tissue deformation.
    Goksel O; Salcudean SE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):248-56. PubMed ID: 20426119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rheological assessment of a polymeric spherical structure using a three-dimensional shear wave scattering model in dynamic spectroscopy elastography.
    Montagnon E; Hadj-Henni A; Schmitt C; Cloutier G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Feb; 61(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 24474134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques.
    Gennisson JL; Deffieux T; Fink M; Tanter M
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 May; 94(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 23619292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.