BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22482630)

  • 1. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
    Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Qian X; Rajaram R; Calderon-Colon X; Yang G; Phan T; Lalush DS; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 19928069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TU-E-217BCD-11: Evaluating the Performance of a Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.
    Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Qian X; Sprenger F; Spronk D; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Ruth C; Jing Z; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3916. PubMed ID: 28518705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study.
    Shan J; Tucker AW; Lee YZ; Heath MD; Wang X; Foos DH; Lu J; Zhou O
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 25478786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of carbon nanotube x-ray source array for stationary head computed tomography.
    Spronk D; Luo Y; Inscoe CR; Lee YZ; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1089-1099. PubMed ID: 33382470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carbon nanotube electron field emitters for x-ray imaging of human breast cancer.
    Gidcumb E; Gao B; Shan J; Inscoe C; Lu J; Zhou O
    Nanotechnology; 2014 Jun; 25(24):245704. PubMed ID: 24869902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second generation stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system with faster scan time and wider angular span.
    Calliste J; Wu G; Laganis PE; Spronk D; Jafari H; Olson K; Gao B; Lee YZ; Zhou O; Lu J
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4482-4495. PubMed ID: 28569999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization and preliminary imaging evaluation of a clinical prototype stationary intraoral tomosynthesis system.
    Inscoe CR; Platin E; Mauriello SM; Broome A; Mol A; Gaalaas LR; Regan Anderson MW; Puett C; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5172-5185. PubMed ID: 30259988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Tucker AW; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031917. PubMed ID: 23464332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and feasibility studies of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Yang G; Qian X; Phan T; Sprenger F; Sultana S; Calderon-Colon X; Kearse B; Spronk D; Lu J; Zhou O
    Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2011 Aug; 648(Suppl 1):S220-S223. PubMed ID: 21808428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
    Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao B; Zhou J; Hu YH; Mertelmeier T; Ludwig J; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A carbon nanotube x-ray source array designed for a new multisource cone beam computed tomography scanner.
    Li B; Inscoe CR; Xu S; Capo T; Tyndall DA; Lee YZ; Lu J; Zhou O
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Mar; 69(7):. PubMed ID: 38471174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.