BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22482632)

  • 1. A semiempirical linear model of indirect, flat-panel x-ray detectors.
    Huang SY; Yang K; Abbey CK; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2108-18. PubMed ID: 22482632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).
    Star-Lack J; Sun M; Meyer A; Morf D; Constantin D; Fahrig R; Abel E
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031916. PubMed ID: 24593734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-ray scatter data for flat-panel detector CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med; 2007 Mar; 23(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 17568538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo model of a prototype flat-panel detector for multi-energy applications in radiotherapy.
    Ozoemelam I; Myronakis M; Harris TC; Corral Arroyo P; Huber P; Jacobson MW; Hu YH; Fueglistaller R; Lehmann M; Morf D; Berbeco RI
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):5944-5955. PubMed ID: 37665764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.
    Mainprize JG; Bloomquist AK; Kempston MP; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3159-64. PubMed ID: 17022208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: comparison to flat-panel detectors.
    Le Huy Q; Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1225-36. PubMed ID: 20384260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semiempirical simulation of x-ray detectors for imaging applications.
    Bontempi M; Bettuzzi M; Visani A
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7677-85. PubMed ID: 23231315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Diaz O; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121901. PubMed ID: 25471961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cascaded systems analysis of noise and detectability in dual-energy cone-beam CT.
    Gang GJ; Zbijewski W; Webster Stayman J; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5145-56. PubMed ID: 22894440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
    Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling scintillator-photodiodes as detectors for megavoltage CT.
    Monajemi TT; Steciw S; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1225-34. PubMed ID: 15191313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of the modulation transfer function, normalized noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency for two flat panel detectors: a fluoroscopic and a cone beam computer tomography flat panel detectors.
    Benítez RB; Ning R; Conover D; Liu S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 19923685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a novel high quantum efficiency MV x-ray detector for image-guided radiotherapy: A feasibility study.
    Liu J; Xu Y; Teymurazyan A; Papandreou Z; Pang G
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):152-163. PubMed ID: 31682020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.