These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
833 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22482963)
1. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan. Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Fader AN; Escobar PF Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopy-assisted robotic myomectomy using the da Vinci system. Mao SP; Lai HC; Chang FW; Yu MH; Chang CC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 46(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 17638628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications. Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes. Desai MM; Berger AK; Brandina RR; Zehnder P; Simmons M; Aron M; Skinner EC; Gill IS Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 22036642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting. Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery]. Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience. Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy; a feasible technique for removal of unfavorably localized myomas. Lönnerfors C; Persson J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 19639456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma. Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]