These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22484011)
81. The contribution of working memory to fluid reasoning: capacity, control, or both? Chuderski A; Necka E J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1689-710. PubMed ID: 22612170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Neural mechanisms of internal distraction suppression in visual attention. Rajan A; Meyyappan S; Walker H; Henry Samuel IB; Hu Z; Ding M Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():77-88. PubMed ID: 30933692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control. Unsworth N; Robison MK Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1282-1311. PubMed ID: 28108977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction. Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance. Wiemers EA; Redick TS Conscious Cogn; 2019 May; 71():39-58. PubMed ID: 30928898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory. Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Saturation of auditory short-term memory causes a plateau in the sustained anterior negativity event-related potential. Alunni-Menichini K; Guimond S; Bermudez P; Nolden S; Lefebvre C; Jolicoeur P Brain Res; 2014 Dec; 1592():55-64. PubMed ID: 25446005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Cognitive control in context: working memory capacity and proactive control. Redick TS Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():1-9. PubMed ID: 24240136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance. Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR; Kane MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 28639800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Is inattentional blindness related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity or executive control functioning? Hannon EM; Richards A Perception; 2010; 39(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 20465168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study. Unsworth N; Robison MK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Overwriting and intrusion in short-term memory. Bancroft TD; Jones JA; Ensor TM; Hockley WE; Servos P Mem Cognit; 2016 Apr; 44(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 26637338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing. Murphy S; Fraenkel N; Dalton P Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 23969299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity. Yurgil KA; Golob EJ Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1263-74. PubMed ID: 24016201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective. Unsworth N; Robison MK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):77-103. PubMed ID: 30998072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. 'What's in a name?' 'No more than when it's mine own'. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction. Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB; Jones DM; Marsja E; Neely G Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():161-6. PubMed ID: 24880979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy. Kane MJ; Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Gross GM; Chun CA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Aug; 145(8):1017-1048. PubMed ID: 27454042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Hughes RW; Hurlstone MJ; Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 22731996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Inattentional deafness to auditory alarms: Inter-individual differences, electrophysiological signature and single trial classification. Dehais F; Roy RN; Scannella S Behav Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 360():51-59. PubMed ID: 30508609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]