383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22484125)
1. Groningen temporomandibular total joint prosthesis: an 8-year longitudinal follow-up on function and pain.
Schuurhuis JM; Dijkstra PU; Stegenga B; de Bont LG; Spijkervet FK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):815-20. PubMed ID: 22484125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term study of temporomandibular joint surgery with alloplastic implants compared with nonimplant surgery and nonsurgical rehabilitation for painful temporomandibular joint disc displacement.
Fricton JR; Look JO; Schiffman E; Swift J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1400-11; discussion 1411-2. PubMed ID: 12465000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-year prospective outcome analysis and complications following total replacement of the temporomandibular joint with the TMJ Concepts system.
Sidebottom AJ; Gruber E
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 23618995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction with total alloplastic joint replacement.
Jones RH
Aust Dent J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 21332746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medium-term outcomes and complications after total replacement of the temporomandibular joint. Prospective outcome analysis after 3 and 5 years.
Gruber EA; McCullough J; Sidebottom AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):412-5. PubMed ID: 25818493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term follow-up of the CAD/CAM patient fitted total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system.
Mercuri LG; Wolford LM; Sanders B; White RD; Giobbie-Hurder A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1440-8. PubMed ID: 12465008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in pain and mouth opening at 1 year following temporomandibular joint replacement--a prospective study.
Kanatas AN; Jenkins GW; Smith AB; Worrall SF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 49(6):455-8. PubMed ID: 20832148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A ten-year experience and follow-up of three hundred patients fitted with the Biomet/Lorenz Microfixation TMJ replacement system.
Leandro LF; Ono HY; Loureiro CC; Marinho K; Guevara HA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 23769150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison study of one-year outcomes for all titanium total temporomandibular joint replacements in patients allergic to metal and cobalt-chromium replacement joints in patients not allergic to metal.
Hussain OT; Sah S; Sidebottom AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 52(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 23522619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomet Microfixation Temporomandibular Joint Replacement System: a 3-year follow-up study of patients treated during 1995 to 2005.
Giannakopoulos HE; Sinn DP; Quinn PD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):787-94; discussion 795-6. PubMed ID: 22449430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of arthroscopic surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: long-term results covering 10 years.
Murakami K; Segami N; Okamoto M; Yamamura I; Takahashi K; Tsuboi Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct; 28(5):264-71. PubMed ID: 11467389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 2 temporomandibular joint total joint prosthesis systems.
Wolford LM; Dingwerth DJ; Talwar RM; Pitta MC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 61(6):685-90; discussion 690. PubMed ID: 12796878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical management of advanced osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint with metal fossa-eminence hemijoint replacement: 10-year retrospective study.
Baltali E; Keller EE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1847-55. PubMed ID: 18718391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fourteen-year follow-up of a patient-fitted total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system.
Mercuri LG; Edibam NR; Giobbie-Hurder A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1140-8. PubMed ID: 17517298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of open temporomandibular joint surgery following failure to improve after arthroscopy: is there an algorithm for success?
Tzanidakis K; Sidebottom AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):818-21. PubMed ID: 23701829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporomandibular custom hemijoint replacement prosthesis: prospective clinical and kinematic study.
Keller EE; Baltali E; Liang X; Zhao K; Huebner M; An KN
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):276-88. PubMed ID: 21856060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint treated by discectomy and hemi-arthroplasty with a Christensen fossa-eminence prosthesis.
McLeod NM; Saeed NR; Hensher R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 39(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 11178859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporomandibular joint discectomy for treatment of unilateral internal derangements--a 5 year follow-up evaluation.
Nyberg J; Adell R; Svensson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 33(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 14690653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint. Up to 8 years of follow-up of patients treated with Biomet(®) total joint prostheses.
Westermark A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(10):951-5. PubMed ID: 20594807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Condylar disk plication for temporomandibular joint internal derangement treatment: surgical technique and results.
Vasconcelos BC; Porto GG; Bessa-Nogueira RV
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005 Jul; 10 Suppl 2():E133-8. PubMed ID: 15995573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]