These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22484789)

  • 1. Investigation of the influence of reflection on the attenuation of cancellous bone.
    Klinge S; Hackl K; Gilbert RP
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2013 Jan; 12(1):185-99. PubMed ID: 22484789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical and experimental study on the wave attenuation in bone--FDTD simulation of ultrasound propagation in cancellous bone.
    Nagatani Y; Mizuno K; Saeki T; Matsukawa M; Sakaguchi T; Hosoi H
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Nov; 48(6-7):607-12. PubMed ID: 18589470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical simulation of wave propagation in cancellous bone.
    Padilla F; Bossy E; Haiat G; Jenson F; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e239-43. PubMed ID: 16859723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of the biot model to ultrasound in bone: direct problem.
    Fellah ZA; Sebaa N; Fellah M; Mitri FG; Ogam E; Lauriks W; Depollier C
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1508-15. PubMed ID: 18986940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the boundary conditions on longitudinal wave propagation in a viscoelastic medium.
    Eskandari H; Baghani A; Salcudean SE; Rohling R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):3997-4017. PubMed ID: 19502703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro acoustic waves propagation in human and bovine cancellous bone.
    Cardoso L; Teboul F; Sedel L; Oddou C; Meunier A
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Oct; 18(10):1803-12. PubMed ID: 14584891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the multiscale FEM to the modeling of cancellous bone.
    Ilic S; Hackl K; Gilbert R
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Feb; 9(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 19568778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a numerical cancellous bone model for finite-difference time-domain simulations of ultrasound propagation.
    Hosokawa A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1219-33. PubMed ID: 18599410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient ultrasound propagation in porous media using Biot theory and fractional calculus: application to human cancellous bone.
    Fellah M; Fellah ZE; Mitri FG; Ogam E; Depollier C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):1867-81. PubMed ID: 23556556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictions of angle dependent tortuosity and elasticity effects on sound propagation in cancellous bone.
    Aygün H; Attenborough K; Postema M; Lauriks W; Langton CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3286-90. PubMed ID: 20000942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micro-scale finite element modeling of ultrasound propagation in aluminum trabecular bone-mimicking phantoms: A comparison between numerical simulation and experimental results.
    Vafaeian B; Le LH; Tran TN; El-Rich M; El-Bialy T; Adeeb S
    Ultrasonics; 2016 May; 68():17-28. PubMed ID: 26894840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional simulation of ultrasound propagation through trabecular bone structures measured by synchrotron microtomography.
    Bossy E; Padilla F; Peyrin F; Laugier P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5545-56. PubMed ID: 16306651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of a gradient of material properties on ultrasonic wave propagation in cortical bone: application to axial transmission.
    Haïat G; Naili S; Grimal Q; Talmant M; Desceliers C; Soize C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4043-52. PubMed ID: 19507985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical angle-dependent Biot and MBA models for acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone.
    Lee KI; Hughes ER; Humphrey VF; Leighton TG; Choi MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 17183128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical investigation of ultrasonic attenuation through 2D trabecular bone structures reconstructed from CT scans and random realizations.
    Gilbert RP; Guyenne P; Li J
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Feb; 45():143-56. PubMed ID: 24480174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of acoustic impedances of multi matching layers for narrowband ultrasonic airborne transducers at frequencies <2.5 MHz - Application of a genetic algorithm.
    Saffar S; Abdullah A
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):169-85. PubMed ID: 21893329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical investigation of ultrasound reflection and backscatter measurements in cancellous bone on various receiving areas.
    Hosokawa A
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jul; 54(5):1237-44. PubMed ID: 24128942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three-scale finite element investigation into the effects of tissue mineralisation and lamellar organisation in human cortical and trabecular bone.
    Vaughan TJ; McCarthy CT; McNamara LM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():50-62. PubMed ID: 22659366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of acoustic characteristics predicted by Biot's theory and the modified Biot-Attenborough model in cancellous bone.
    Lee KI; Yoon SW
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):364-8. PubMed ID: 16321640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the geometry of the RVE for cancellous bone by using the effective complex shear modulus.
    Klinge S
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2013 Apr; 12(2):401-12. PubMed ID: 22699522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.