145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22484963)
1. The Objective Borderline method (OBM): a probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments.
Shulruf B; Turner R; Poole P; Wilkinson T
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 May; 18(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 22484963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.
Yousuf N; Violato C; Zuberi RW
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 26158330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
Hays R; Gupta TS; Veitch J
Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):810-5. PubMed ID: 18564094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method.
Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto SM; Norman GR
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16729239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship.
Schindler N; Corcoran J; DaRosa D
Am J Surg; 2007 Feb; 193(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17236857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty.
Shulruf B; Adelstein BA; Damodaran A; Harris P; Kennedy S; O'Sullivan A; Taylor S
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):272. PubMed ID: 30458741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using elements from an acute abdominal pain Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) leads to more standardized grading in the surgical clerkship for third-year medical students.
Falcone JL; Schenarts KD; Ferson PF; Day HD
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 21821222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive validity of a tool to resolve borderline grades in OSCEs.
Klein Nulend R; Harris P; Shulruf B
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(3):Doc31. PubMed ID: 32566733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential testing in a high stakes OSCE: Determining number of screening tests.
Currie GP; Sivasubramaniam S; Cleland J
Med Teach; 2016 Jul; 38(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 26474117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cut-scores revisited: feasibility of a new method for group standard setting.
Shulruf B; Coombes L; Damodaran A; Freeman A; Jones P; Lieberman S; Poole P; Rhee J; Wilkinson T; Harris P
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):126. PubMed ID: 29879954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pass-fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning.
White CB; Fantone JC
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Oct; 15(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 20012686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students' well-being and academic outcomes.
Spring L; Robillard D; Gehlbach L; Simas TA
Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):867-77. PubMed ID: 21848714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A change to pass/fail grading in the first two years at one medical school results in improved psychological well-being.
Bloodgood RA; Short JG; Jackson JM; Martindale JR
Acad Med; 2009 May; 84(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 19704204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard setting: a comparison of case-author and modified borderline-group methods in a small-scale OSCE.
Humphrey-Murto S; MacFadyen JC
Acad Med; 2002 Jul; 77(7):729-32. PubMed ID: 12114151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of pass/fail grading.
Short JG; Bloodgood RA
Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1470; author reply 1470-1. PubMed ID: 19858790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations.
Shulruf B; Yang YY; Huang PH; Yang LY; Huang CC; Huang CC; Liu CW; Huang SS; Chen CH; Lee FY; Kao SY
BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):167. PubMed ID: 32450878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The benefits of pass-fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students.
Rohe DE; Barrier PA; Clark MM; Cook DA; Vickers KS; Decker PA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2006 Nov; 81(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 17120399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Outcome of Students' Performance Using the Standard Setting Method with the Absolute Grading Method in Preclinical Examination.
Pepple DJ
Niger J Physiol Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 26196574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
