These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using 3 decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system. Gonnella JS; Erdmann JB; Hojat M Med Educ; 2004 Apr; 38(4):425-34. PubMed ID: 15025644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Standard setting in OSCEs: a borderline approach. Rajiah K; Veettil SK; Kumar S Clin Teach; 2014 Dec; 11(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 25417986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of a modified Cohen method of standard setting. Taylor CA Med Teach; 2011; 33(12):e678-82. PubMed ID: 22225450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Turning words into numbers: establishing an empirical cut score for a letter graded examination. Burch VC; Norman GR Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):442-6. PubMed ID: 18608946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating oral case presentations using a checklist: how do senior student-evaluators compare with faculty? Kakar SP; Catalanotti JS; Flory AL; Simmens SJ; Lewis KL; Mintz ML; Haywood YC; Blatt BC Acad Med; 2013 Sep; 88(9):1363-7. PubMed ID: 23887016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37. Bandaranayake RC Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies. Schoonheim-Klein ME; Habets LL; Aartman IH; van der Vleuten CP; Hoogstraten J; van der Velden U Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Nov; 10(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 17038015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A resource efficient and reliable standard setting method for OSCEs: Borderline regression method using standardized patients as sole raters in clinical case encounters with medical students. Milan FB; Grochowalski JH Med Teach; 2022 Aug; 44(8):878-885. PubMed ID: 35234562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of standard-setting procedures for an OSCE in undergraduate medical education. Kaufman DM; Mann KV; Muijtjens AM; van der Vleuten CP Acad Med; 2000 Mar; 75(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 10724316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship of pass/fail grading and curriculum structure with well-being among preclinical medical students: a multi-institutional study. Reed DA; Shanafelt TD; Satele DW; Power DV; Eacker A; Harper W; Moutier C; Durning S; Massie FS; Thomas MR; Sloan JA; Dyrbye LN Acad Med; 2011 Nov; 86(11):1367-73. PubMed ID: 21952063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Standard setting for OSCEs: trial of borderline approach. Kilminster S; Roberts T Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 15316271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A standard setting method with the best performing students as point of reference: practical and affordable. Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP Med Teach; 2010; 32(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 20163232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores. Simon SR; Bui A; Day S; Berti D; Volkan K J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 18070260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method. Homer M; Pell G Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Enhancing the defensibility of examiners' marks in high stake OSCEs. Shulruf B; Damodaran A; Jones P; Kennedy S; Mangos G; O'Sullivan AJ; Rhee J; Taylor S; Velan G; Harris P BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jan; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 29304806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prior academic background and student performance in assessment in a graduate entry programme. Craig PL; Gordon JJ; Clark RM; Langendyk V Med Educ; 2004 Nov; 38(11):1164-8. PubMed ID: 15507010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea. Park SY; Lee SH; Kim MJ; Ji KH; Ryu JH J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():25. PubMed ID: 34565121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How sure can we be that a student really failed? On the measurement precision of individual pass-fail decisions from the perspective of Item Response Theory. Schauber SK; Hecht M Med Teach; 2020 Dec; 42(12):1374-1384. PubMed ID: 32857621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]