These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22486395)

  • 1. The effect of head movement and head positioning on sound field audiometry.
    Shaw P; Greenwood H
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 22486395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High frequency tympanometry findings in neonates: does it depend on head position?
    Kei J; Mazlan R; Kim SC; Pont J; Schilt SA; Sewak R; Shelton V; Sutherland D
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 22582974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies in infant behavioural audiometry. II. Six-week-old infants.
    Bench J; Collyer Y; Mentz L; Wilson I
    Audiology; 1976; 15(4):302-14. PubMed ID: 1275815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of variability in sound field audiometry due to subject movement.
    Beynon GJ; Munro KJ
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Oct; 29(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 8838551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
    Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory steady state response in sound field.
    Hernández-Pérez H; Torres-Fortuny A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 23176132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound field measurement tutorial. Working Group on Sound Field Calibration of the Committee on Audiologic Evaluation American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1991 Jan; (3):25-38. PubMed ID: 1672069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective electrophysiologic findings of round window stimulation in a model of experimentally induced stapes fixation.
    Lupo JE; Koka K; Holland NJ; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1215-24. PubMed ID: 19779388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electroacoustic calibration for sound field warble tone thresholds.
    Cox RM; McCormick VA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Nov; 52(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 3669633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"?
    Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 May; 63(5):1501-8. PubMed ID: 690329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-frequency modulated quadratic and cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Drexl M; Gürkov R; Krause E
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):91-101. PubMed ID: 22465462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach.
    Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.