These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1056 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22486845)
1. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols. Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation. Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file. Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model. Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant. Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant. Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: a scanning electron microscope study. Pirani C; Pelliccioni GA; Marchionni S; Montebugnoli L; Piana G; Prati C J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1433-40. PubMed ID: 19801246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Debris and smear removal in flattened root canals after use of different irrigant agitation protocols. Ribeiro EM; Silva-Sousa YT; Souza-Gabriel AE; Sousa-Neto MD; Lorencetti KT; Silva SR Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Jun; 75(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 22131294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study. Goel S; Tewari S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 19576804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles. Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]