These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22487398)
1. Multiple approaches to valuation of conservation design and low-impact development features in residential subdivisions. Bowman T; Tyndall JC; Thompson J; Kliebenstein J; Colletti JP J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 104():101-13. PubMed ID: 22487398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valuation of open space and conservation features in residential subdivisions. Bowman T; Thompson J; Colletti J J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):321-30. PubMed ID: 18180092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the willingness of the public to pay to conserve urban green space: the Hangzhou City, China, case. Chen B; Bao Z; Zhu Z J Environ Health; 2006 Dec; 69(5):26-30. PubMed ID: 17190339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. Tyrväinen L J Environ Manage; 2001 May; 62(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 11400466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of impact fees to incentivize low-impact development and promote compact growth. Lu Z; Noonan D; Crittenden J; Jeong H; Wang D Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(19):10744-52. PubMed ID: 23815440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use--an evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis. Hurlimann A; McKay J J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 16678338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urban residents' priorities for neighborhood features. A survey of New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina. Hong T; Farley TA Am J Prev Med; 2008 Apr; 34(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 18374251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping urban revitalization: using GIS spatial analysis to evaluate a new housing policy. Perkins DD; Larsen C; Brown BB J Prev Interv Community; 2009; 37(1):48-65. PubMed ID: 19197674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contingent Valuation of Residents' Attitudes and Willingness-to-Pay for Non-point Source Pollution Control: A Case Study in AL-Prespa, Southeastern Albania. Grazhdani D Environ Manage; 2015 Jul; 56(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 25860594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado. Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valuation of crop genetic resources in Kaski, Nepal: farmers' willingness to pay for rice landraces conservation. Poudel D; Johnsen FH J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):483-91. PubMed ID: 18359142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public willingness to pay for recovering and downlisting threatened and endangered marine species. Wallmo K; Lew DK Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):830-9. PubMed ID: 22827248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valuing visitor access to forested areas and exploring willingness to pay for forest conservation and restoration finance: The case of small island developing state of Mauritius. Iranah P; Lal P; Wolde BT; Burli P J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():868-877. PubMed ID: 29986336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Brander LM; Koetse MJ J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2763-73. PubMed ID: 21763064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the potential for conservation development: biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives. Pejchar L; Morgan PM; Caldwell MR; Palmer C; Daily GC Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17298512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How willing are the public to pay for anti-hypertensive drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a survey in a Chinese city. Tang JL; Wang WZ; An JG; Hu YH; Cheng SH; Griffiths S Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):244-54. PubMed ID: 19491141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis. Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Del Saz-Salazar S; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4574-83. PubMed ID: 19473689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]