667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22488106)
1. Design, simulation and experimental validation of a novel flexible neural probe for deep brain stimulation and multichannel recording.
Lai HY; Liao LD; Lin CT; Hsu JH; He X; Chen YY; Chang JY; Chen HF; Tsang S; Shih YY
J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036001. PubMed ID: 22488106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
Wei XF; Grill WM
J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and fabrication of a polyimide-based microelectrode array: application in neural recording and repeatable electrolytic lesion in rat brain.
Chen YY; Lai HY; Lin SH; Cho CW; Chao WH; Liao CH; Tsang S; Chen YF; Lin SY
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Aug; 182(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 19467262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fabrication and testing of polyimide-based microelectrode arrays for cortical mapping of evoked potentials.
Myllymaa S; Myllymaa K; Korhonen H; Töyräs J; Jääskeläinen JE; Djupsund K; Tanila H; Lappalainen R
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Jun; 24(10):3067-72. PubMed ID: 19380223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of electrode design on the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.
Butson CR; McIntyre CC
J Neural Eng; 2006 Mar; 3(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16510937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Band-tunable and multiplexed integrated circuits for simultaneous recording and stimulation with microelectrode arrays.
Olsson RH; Buhl DL; Sirota AM; Buzsaki G; Wise KD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1303-11. PubMed ID: 16041994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microelectrode array for chronic deep-brain microstimulation and recording.
McCreery D; Lossinsky A; Pikov V; Liu X
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):726-37. PubMed ID: 16602580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo electrical impedance spectroscopy of tissue reaction to microelectrode arrays.
Mercanzini A; Colin P; Bensadoun JC; Bertsch A; Renaud P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jul; 56(7):1909-18. PubMed ID: 19362904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lesion of the ventral tegmental area amplifies stimulation-induced Fos expression in the rat brain.
Majkutewicz I; Cecot T; Jerzemowska G; Myślińska D; Plucińska K; Trojniar W; Wrona D
Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1320():95-105. PubMed ID: 20079346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multielectrode microprobes for deep-brain stimulation fabricated with a customizable 3-D electroplating process.
Motta PS; Judy JW
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):923-33. PubMed ID: 15887542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying long-term microelectrode array functionality using chronic in vivo impedance testing.
Prasad A; Sanchez JC
J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):026028. PubMed ID: 22442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrode modifications to lower electrode impedance and improve neural signal recording sensitivity.
Chung T; Wang JQ; Wang J; Cao B; Li Y; Pang SW
J Neural Eng; 2015 Oct; 12(5):056018. PubMed ID: 26394650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the implanted pulse generator as reference electrode in finite element model of monopolar deep brain stimulation.
Walckiers G; Fuchs B; Thiran JP; Mosig JR; Pollo C
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jan; 186(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 19895845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of electrode impedance and stimulation efficacy of a chronic cortical implant using novel annulus electrodes in rat motor cortex.
Wang C; Brunton E; Haghgooie S; Cassells K; Lowery A; Rajan R
J Neural Eng; 2013 Aug; 10(4):046010. PubMed ID: 23819958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants.
Prasad A; Xue QS; Sankar V; Nishida T; Shaw G; Streit WJ; Sanchez JC
J Neural Eng; 2012 Oct; 9(5):056015. PubMed ID: 23010756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability.
Rousche PJ; Pellinen DS; Pivin DP; Williams JC; Vetter RJ; Kipke DR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Mar; 48(3):361-71. PubMed ID: 11327505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gelatine-embedded electrodes--a novel biocompatible vehicle allowing implantation of highly flexible microelectrodes.
Lind G; Linsmeier CE; Thelin J; Schouenborg J
J Neural Eng; 2010 Aug; 7(4):046005. PubMed ID: 20551508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of signals from a chronically implanted, silicon-based electrode array in non-human primate primary motor cortex.
Suner S; Fellows MR; Vargas-Irwin C; Nakata GK; Donoghue JP
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 16425835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computational model for the stimulation of rat sciatic nerve using a transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode.
Raspopovic S; Capogrosso M; Micera S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Aug; 19(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 21693427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
