BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22488514)

  • 1. Repair of dental resin-based composites.
    Baur V; Ilie N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):601-8. PubMed ID: 22488514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites.
    Ivanovas S; Hickel R; Ilie N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):915-22. PubMed ID: 20953808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite.
    Palasuk J; Platt JA; Cho SD; Levon JA; Brown DT; Hovijitra ST
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 22830537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-year interfacial bond durability and nanoleakage of repaired silorane-based resin composite.
    Mobarak E; El-Deeb H
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):408-18. PubMed ID: 23110581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage.
    Mahmoud SH; Al-Wakeel Eel S
    Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(10):e131-9. PubMed ID: 22026005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength evaluation of nanohybrid resin-based composite repair.
    Moncada G; Angel P; Fernandez E; Alonso P; Martin J; Gordan VV
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 22623463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding of glass ceramic and indirect composite to non-aged and aged resin composite.
    Gresnigt M; Özcan M; Muis M; Kalk W
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Feb; 14(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 21594236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reparability of aged silorane with methacrylate-based resin composite: micro-shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Baldini M; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 21942241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of organic acids present in oral biofilm on the durability of the repair bond strength, sorption and solubility of resin composites.
    Da Silva S; Da Silva EM; Delphim MB; Poskus LT; Amaral CM
    Am J Dent; 2015 Dec; 28(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 26846044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repairability of aged dimethacrylate-free ORMOCER-based dental composite resins with different surface roughening methods and intermediate materials.
    Pirmoradian M; Jerri Al-Bakhakh BA; Behroozibakhsh M; Pedram P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 35513916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex.
    Özcan M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22812912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite.
    Ozcan M; Cura C; Brendeke J
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Dec; 12(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20157647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins.
    Rinastiti M; Özcan M; Siswomihardjo W; Busscher HJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):625-33. PubMed ID: 20499119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems.
    AlJehani YA; Baskaradoss JK; Geevarghese A; AlShehry MA; Vallittu PK
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():55. PubMed ID: 25934420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials.
    Ilie N; Hickel R; Valceanu AS; Huth KC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):489-98. PubMed ID: 21365459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments.
    Rinastiti M; Ozcan M; Siswomihardjo W; Busscher HJ
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19735692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of composite resin to amalgam.
    Ozcan M; Koolman C; Aladag A; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 21740243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.