128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22488838)
1. Revision of sediment quality triad indicators in Puget Sound (Washington, USA): I. a Sediment Chemistry Index and targets for mixtures of toxicants.
Long ER; Dutch M; Partridge V; Weakland S; Welch K
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 22488838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Habitat-related benthic macrofaunal assemblages of bays and estuaries of the western United States.
Ranasinghe JA; Welch KI; Slattery PN; Montagne DE; Huff DD; Lee H; Hyland JL; Thompson B; Weisberg SB; Oakden JM; Cadien DB; Velarde RG
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):638-48. PubMed ID: 22987518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial extent of degraded sediment quality in Puget Sound (Washington State, U.S.A.) based upon measures of the sediment quality triad.
Long ER; Dutch M; Aasen S; Welch K; Hameedi MJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Dec; 111(1-3):173-222. PubMed ID: 16311828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid deterioration of sediment surface habitats in Bellingham Bay, Washington State, as indicated by benthic foraminifera.
Nesbitt EA; Martin RA; Martin DE; Apple J
Mar Pollut Bull; 2015 Aug; 97(1-2):273-284. PubMed ID: 26059642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of stress in benthic communities along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts within different ranges of sediment contamination from chemical mixtures.
Hyland JL; Balthis WL; Engle VD; Long ER; Paul JF; Summers JK; Van Dolah RF
Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):149-61. PubMed ID: 12620012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxicity profiling: An integrated effect-based tool for site-specific sediment quality assessment.
Hamers T; Leonards PE; Legler J; Vethaak AD; Schipper CA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 20872654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transitioning sediment quality assessment into regulations: Challenges and solutions in implementing California's sediment quality objectives.
Beegan C; Bay SM
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):586-8. PubMed ID: 22987517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines based on benthic macrofauna responses.
Ritter KJ; Bay SM; Smith RW; Vidal-Dorsch DE; Field LJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 22275113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Munition constituents: Preliminary sediment screening criteria for the protection of marine benthic invertebrates.
Pascoe GA; Kroeger K; Leisle D; Feldpausch RJ
Chemosphere; 2010 Oct; 81(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 20674958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of sediment quality guidelines in the assessment and management of contaminated surficial sediments in Port Jackson (Sydney Harbour), Australia.
Birch GF; Taylor SE
Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):860-70. PubMed ID: 11992176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of numerical sediment quality targets for the St. Louis River Area of Concern.
Crane JL; MacDonald DD; Ingersoll CG; Smorong DE; Lindskoog RA; Severn CG; Berger TA; Field LJ
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2002 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12045868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) for the assessment of metal contamination in marine and estuarine environments.
Hübner R; Astin KB; Herbert RJ
J Environ Monit; 2009 Apr; 11(4):713-22. PubMed ID: 19557219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toxicity of sediment pore water in Puget Sound (Washington, USA): a review of spatial status and temporal trends.
Long ER; Carr RS; Biedenbach JM; Weakland S; Partridge V; Dutch M
Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Jan; 185(1):755-75. PubMed ID: 22392619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of multiple chemical and non-chemical stressors on benthic communities in a mid-west agricultural stream.
Hall LW; Killen WD; Anderson RD; Alden RW
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Aug; 52(10):1008-1021. PubMed ID: 28609223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of national and regional sediment quality guidelines for classifying sediment toxicity in California.
Bay SM; Ritter KJ; Vidal-Dorsch DE; Field LJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):597-609. PubMed ID: 22730345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of sediment quality results with acid volatile sulfide (AVS) and simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) ratio in Vojvodina (Serbia) sediments.
Prica M; Dalmacija B; Roncević S; Krcmar D; Becelić M
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(2-3):235-44. PubMed ID: 17936333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A large-scale categorization of sites in San Francisco Bay, USA, based on the sediment quality triad, toxicity identification evaluations, and gradient studies.
Hunt JW; Anderson BS; Phillips BM; Tjeerdema RS; Taberski KM; Wilson CJ; Puckett HM; Stephenson M; Fairey R; Oakden J
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Jun; 20(6):1252-65. PubMed ID: 11392135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening analysis of hundreds of sediment pollutants and evaluation of their effects on benthic organisms in Dokai Bay, Japan.
Kadokami K; Li X; Pan S; Ueda N; Hamada K; Jinya D; Iwamura T
Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(2):721-8. PubMed ID: 23089392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecotoxicity and chemical sediment data classification by the use of self-organising maps.
Tsakovski S; Kudlak B; Simeonov V; Wolska L; Namiesnik J
Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Jan; 631(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 19084619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting metal toxicity in sediments: a critique of current approaches.
Simpson SL; Batley GE
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 17283593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
