116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22489980)
1. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: what role do they play?
Cook DA
Med Teach; 2012; 34(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 22489980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians' knowledge, attitudes and professional use of RCTs and meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
De Vito C; Nobile CG; Furnari G; Pavia M; De Giusti M; Angelillo IF; Villari P
Eur J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 19(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 19129347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
Korttila K; Apfel CC
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic reviews of evidence in medical education and clinical medicine: is the nature of evidence similar?
Patrício M; vaz Carneiro A
Med Teach; 2012; 34(6):474-82. PubMed ID: 22578042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations.
Hammad TA; Pinheiro SP; Neyarapally GA
Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 21878445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small group learning in medical education: a second look at the Springer, Stanne, and Donovan meta-analysis.
Colliver JA; Feltovich PJ; Verhulst SJ
Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 12632701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials.
Flemming K; Adamson J; Atkin K
Palliat Med; 2008 Mar; 22(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18372377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How helpful are meta-analyses in determining the best therapy of blood diseases?
Gale RP; Lazarus HM
Acta Haematol; 2011; 125(1-2):91-101. PubMed ID: 21150191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflections on experimental research in medical education.
Cook DA; Beckman TJ
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 18427941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evidence-based clinical practice].
Gluud C
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 24(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 12905675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence shaped health professional education: can we talk about a new paradigm?
Hammick M
Med Teach; 2012; 34(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 22578041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classic or Bayesian research design and analysis. Does it make a difference?
Bloom BS; de Pouvourville N; Libert S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 11987435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?
Stegenga J
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2011 Dec; 42(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 22035723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.
Rerkasem K; Rothwell PM
Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 20155790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
