BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22490416)

  • 1. An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.
    Wang LM; Song H; Song X; Zhou XB
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Feb; 125(3):533-5. PubMed ID: 22490416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inclusion of CA-125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Jurkovic D; Valentin L; Testa AC; Bernard JP; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Bourne T
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 25(27):4194-200. PubMed ID: 17698805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Bourne T; Ajossa S; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Czekierdowski A; Savelli L; Van Huffel S; Valentin L; Timmerman D
    Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 18(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 22114135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
    Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
    Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.
    Simsek HS; Tokmak A; Ozgu E; Doganay M; Danisman N; Erkaya S; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7793-7. PubMed ID: 25292065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index.
    Enakpene CA; Omigbodun AO; Goecke TW; Odukogbe AT; Beckmann MW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 19215560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
    Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
    Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
    Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
    Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The values of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 and CA(125) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy].
    Dong L; Chang XH; Ye X; Zhu LR; Zhao Y; Tian L; Cheng HY; Li XP; Zhang H; Liao QP; Fu TY; Cheng YX; Cui H
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 43(12):931-6. PubMed ID: 19134334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses.
    Van Gorp T; Veldman J; Van Calster B; Cadron I; Leunen K; Amant F; Timmerman D; Vergote I
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 48(11):1649-56. PubMed ID: 22226481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External validation of mathematical models to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Valentin L; Testa AC; Ferrazzi E; Dimou I; Lu C; Moerman P; Van Huffel S; Vergote I; Timmerman D;
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Aug; 13(15 Pt 1):4440-7. PubMed ID: 17671128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
    Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ovarian malignancy risk stratification of the adnexal mass using a multivariate index assay.
    Bristow RE; Smith A; Zhang Z; Chan DW; Crutcher G; Fung ET; Munroe DG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 23178277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.