108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22490825)
1. Looking for Darwin in genomic sequences--validity and success of statistical methods.
Zhai W; Nielsen R; Goldman N; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Oct; 29(10):2889-93. PubMed ID: 22490825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
Yang Z; dos Reis M
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the varied pattern of evolution of 2 fungal genomes: a critique of Hughes and Friedman.
Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec; 23(12):2279-82. PubMed ID: 16982818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nucleotide substitution pattern in rice paralogues: implication for negative correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.
Shi X; Wang X; Li Z; Zhu Q; Tang W; Ge S; Luo J
Gene; 2006 Jul; 376(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16644142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Likelihood-ratio tests for positive selection of human and mouse duplicate genes reveal nonconservative and anomalous properties of widely used methods.
Friedman R; Hughes AL
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):388-93. PubMed ID: 16959502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolutionary genomics: detecting selection needs comparative data.
Nielsen R; Hubisz MJ
Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):E6; discussion E7-8. PubMed ID: 15662372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synonymous substitutions substantially improve evolutionary inference from highly diverged proteins.
Seo TK; Kishino H
Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 18570032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.
Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1350-60. PubMed ID: 15044594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative method rules! Codon volatility cannot detect positive Darwinian selection using a single genome sequence.
Dagan T; Graur D
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 15525696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary genomics: codon volatility does not detect selection.
Chen Y; Emerson JJ; Martin TM
Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):E6-7; discussion E7-8. PubMed ID: 15662371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammalian nonsynonymous sites are not overdispersed: comparative genomic analysis of index of dispersion of mammalian proteins.
Kim SH; Yi SV
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Apr; 25(4):634-42. PubMed ID: 18096564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Looking for Darwin in Genomic Sequences: Validity and Success Depends on the Relationship Between Model and Data.
Jones CT; Susko E; Bielawski JP
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():399-426. PubMed ID: 31278672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative genomics and the study of evolution by natural selection.
Ellegren H
Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(21):4586-96. PubMed ID: 19140982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates.
Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive Darwinian selection at the pantophysin (Pan I) locus in marine gadid fishes.
Pogson GH; Mesa KA
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jan; 21(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 12949133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16405571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective pressures at a codon-level predict deleterious mutations in human disease genes.
Arbiza L; Duchi S; Montaner D; Burguet J; Pantoja-Uceda D; Pineda-Lucena A; Dopazo J; Dopazo H
J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(5):1390-404. PubMed ID: 16584746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage.
Yang Z; Nielsen R
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 18178545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
