BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22490825)

  • 21. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 12032247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accelerated evolution of Fetuin-A (FETUA, also AHSG) is driven by positive Darwinian selection, not GC-biased gene conversion.
    Döring Y; Zechner U; Roos C; Rosenkranz D; Zischler H; Herlyn H
    Gene; 2010 Sep; 463(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 20471458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes.
    Yang Z; Swanson WJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 11752189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adaptive evolution after duplication of penaeidin antimicrobial peptides.
    Padhi A; Verghese B; Otta SK; Varghese B; Ramu K
    Fish Shellfish Immunol; 2007 Sep; 23(3):553-66. PubMed ID: 17449277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variation in the pattern of synonymous and nonsynonymous difference between two fungal genomes.
    Hughes AL; Friedman R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1320-4. PubMed ID: 15746015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Molecular evolution of nuclear genes in Cupressacea, a group of conifer trees.
    Kusumi J; Tsumura Y; Yoshimaru H; Tachida H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 May; 19(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 11961107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Site-to-site variation of synonymous substitution rates.
    Pond SK; Muse SV
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2375-85. PubMed ID: 16107593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A combined empirical and mechanistic codon model.
    Doron-Faigenboim A; Pupko T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 17110464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.
    Zeng LW; Comeron JM; Chen B; Kreitman M
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82. PubMed ID: 9720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determinants of synonymous and nonsynonymous variability in three species of Drosophila.
    Haddrill PR; Zeng K; Charlesworth B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 May; 28(5):1731-43. PubMed ID: 21191087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A sliding window-based method to detect selective constraints in protein-coding genes and its application to RNA viruses.
    Fares MA; Elena SF; Ortiz J; Moya A; Barrio E
    J Mol Evol; 2002 Nov; 55(5):509-21. PubMed ID: 12399925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Codon volatility as an indicator of positive selection: data from eukaryotic genome comparisons.
    Friedman R; Hughes AL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):542-6. PubMed ID: 15525698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Overestimation of nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio by reverse-translation of aligned amino acid sequences.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2011; 86(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 21670552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correlated evolution of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in Drosophila.
    Marais G; Domazet-Loso T; Tautz D; Charlesworth B
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Dec; 59(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15599509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates.
    Dunn KA; Kenney T; Gu H; Bielawski JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30642241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Likelihood analysis of the chalcone synthase genes suggests the role of positive selection in morning glories (Ipomoea).
    Yang J; Gu H; Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jan; 58(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 14743314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A beginners guide to estimating the non-synonymous to synonymous rate ratio of all protein-coding genes in a genome.
    Jeffares DC; Tomiczek B; Sojo V; dos Reis M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1201():65-90. PubMed ID: 25388108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The branch-site test of positive selection is surprisingly robust but lacks power under synonymous substitution saturation and variation in GC.
    Gharib WH; Robinson-Rechavi M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jul; 30(7):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23558341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.