162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22491010)
1. Evaluation of deformable image registration and a motion model in CT images with limited features.
Liu F; Hu Y; Zhang Q; Kincaid R; Goodman KA; Mageras GS
Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(9):2539-54. PubMed ID: 22491010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TU-E-BRA-09: Evaluation of a Patient-Specific Respiratory Motion Model in Thoracic and Abdominal Phantom and Patient CT Images.
Liu F; Zhang Q; Hu Y; Goodman K; Mageras G
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3912. PubMed ID: 28518714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduction of irregular breathing artifacts in respiration-correlated CT images using a respiratory motion model.
Hertanto A; Zhang Q; Hu YC; Dzyubak O; Rimner A; Mageras GS
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3070-9. PubMed ID: 22755692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An adaptive motion regularization technique to support sliding motion in deformable image registration.
Fu Y; Liu S; Li HH; Li H; Yang D
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):735-747. PubMed ID: 29251777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A deformable phantom for 4D radiotherapy verification: design and image registration evaluation.
Serban M; Heath E; Stroian G; Collins DL; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1094-102. PubMed ID: 18404944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of deformable image registration between external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer with a 3D-printed deformable pelvis phantom.
Kadoya N; Miyasaka Y; Nakajima Y; Kuroda Y; Ito K; Chiba M; Sato K; Dobashi S; Yamamoto T; Takahashi N; Kubozono M; Takeda K; Jingu K
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 28214368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.
Pukala J; Meeks SL; Staton RJ; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Langen KM
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111703. PubMed ID: 24320411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of 12 DIR algorithms in low-contrast regions for mass and density conserving deformation.
Yeo UJ; Supple JR; Taylor ML; Smith R; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101701. PubMed ID: 24089891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a deformable lung phantom with 3D-printed flexible airways.
Shin DS; Kang SH; Kim KH; Kim TH; Kim DS; Chung JB; Lucero SA; Suh TS; Yamamoto T
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):898-908. PubMed ID: 31863479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A patient-specific respiratory model of anatomical motion for radiation treatment planning.
Zhang Q; Pevsner A; Hertanto A; Hu YC; Rosenzweig KE; Ling CC; Mageras GS
Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4772-81. PubMed ID: 18196805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of a new physical phantom for testing rigid and deformable image registration.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Wisdom P; Zhu XR; Frank SJ; Fuller CD; Gunn GB; Palmer MB; Wages CA; Gillin MT; Yang J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 30580471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative evaluation of the performance of different deformable image registration algorithms in helical, axial, and cone-beam CT images using a mobile phantom.
Ali I; Alsbou N; Jaskowiak J; Ahmad S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):62-73. PubMed ID: 29446235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of CT scan parameters on deformable image registration accuracy using deformable thorax phantom.
Ikeda R; Kadoya N; Nakajima Y; Ishii S; Shibu T; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13917. PubMed ID: 36840512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.
Saleh ZH; Apte AP; Sharp GC; Shusharina NP; Wang Y; Veeraraghavan H; Thor M; Muren LP; Rao SS; Lee NY; Deasy JO
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 24440838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of computed tomography image characteristics and knot spacing on the spatial accuracy of B-spline deformable image registration in the head and neck geometry.
Brouwer CL; Kierkels RG; van 't Veld AA; Sijtsema NM; Meertens H
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():169. PubMed ID: 25074293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a commercial deformable image registration for surface-guided radiotherapy using an ad hoc-developed deformable phantom.
Pallotta S; Kugele M; Redapi L; Ceberg S
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6310-6318. PubMed ID: 33034065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
