These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22491596)
1. Comparison of hemodynamic measurements from invasive and noninvasive monitoring during early resuscitation. Tchorz KM; Chandra MS; Markert RJ; Healy M; Anderson H; Ekeh AP; Saxe JM; Walusimbi MS; Woods RJ; Dominguez KM; McCarthy MC J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Apr; 72(4):852-60. PubMed ID: 22491596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulmonary artery catheter use is associated with reduced mortality in severely injured patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis of 53,312 patients. Friese RS; Shafi S; Gentilello LM Crit Care Med; 2006 Jun; 34(6):1597-601. PubMed ID: 16607232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Joseph P; Bastien O; Lehot JJ Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in trauma patients. Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Chien LC; Lu K; Ahmadpour N; Belzberg H; Demetriades D J Trauma; 2006 Oct; 61(4):844-53; discussion 853-4. PubMed ID: 17033550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography. Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements]. Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of current hemodynamic monitors and echocardiography in resuscitation of the critically ill or injured patient. Josephs SA Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2007; 45(3):31-59. PubMed ID: 17622829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery. Schwann NM; Hillel Z; Hoeft A; Barash P; Möhnle P; Miao Y; Mangano DT Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):994-1002. PubMed ID: 21918165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring methods in critically ill children. Chaiyakulsil C; Chantra M; Katanyuwong P; Khositseth A; Anantasit N PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199203. PubMed ID: 29912937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]