BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22492190)

  • 1. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Disposable vs reusable laryngeal mask airway: a cost-minimization analysis].
    Soulias M; Martin L; Garnier N; Juniot A; Aho LS; Freysz M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Aug; 25(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 16603333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art 2012.
    Overcash M
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1055-66. PubMed ID: 22492184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomised crossover trial comparing a single-use polyvinyl chloride laryngeal mask airway with a single-use silicone laryngeal mask airway.
    Bell SF; Morris NG; Rao A; Wilkes AR; Goodwin N
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Dec; 67(12):1337-42. PubMed ID: 23020699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reusable Laryngeal Mask Airways can be used more than 40 times.
    Goodman EJ; Christenson E; Douglas AM; Ziegler EJ; Lewis BR
    J Clin Anesth; 2008 Mar; 20(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 18410865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical comparison of the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask and the disposable Soft Seal mask in adult patients].
    López AM; Valero R; Pons M; Salvador L; de Riva N; Gomar C
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2007 Oct; 54(8):462-8. PubMed ID: 17993094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of anesthetic drugs.
    Sherman J; Le C; Lamers V; Eckelman M
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1086-90. PubMed ID: 22492186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously ventilating adult patients.
    Cao MM; Webb T; Bjorksten AR
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2004 Aug; 32(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 15675213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative carbon footprint analysis of disposable and reusable vaginal specula.
    Donahue LM; Hilton S; Bell SG; Williams BC; Keoleian GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):225.e1-225.e7. PubMed ID: 32067971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised comparison of the single use LMA Flexible with the reusable LMA Flexible in paediatric dental day-case patients.
    Flynn P; Ahmed FB; Mitchell V; Patel A; Clarke S
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1281-4. PubMed ID: 17991266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine cleaning and autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from reusable laryngeal mask devices.
    Clery G; Brimacombe J; Stone T; Keller C; Curtis S
    Anesth Analg; 2003 Oct; 97(4):1189-1191. PubMed ID: 14500180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cleanroom Coveralls.
    Vozzola E; Overcash M; Griffing E
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):236-248. PubMed ID: 29444994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [About laryngeal mask: is the lowest price material the better cost-efficacy choice?].
    Weil G; Matysiak J; Guye ML; Eghiaian A; Bourgain JL
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2014; 33(9-10):508-13. PubMed ID: 25148718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the Soft Seal disposable and the Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway.
    Shafik MT; Bahlman BU; Hall JE; Ali MS
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Feb; 61(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 16430570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nitrous oxide diffusion into the cuffs of disposable laryngeal mask airways.
    Maino P; Dullenkopf A; Bernet V; Weiss M
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Mar; 60(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 15710013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.