These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22492601)

  • 1. Sterilizing filtration of liposome and related lipid-containing solutions: enhancing successful filter qualification.
    Folmsbee M; Moussourakis M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22492601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Effect of the Volume Throughput and Maximum Flux of Low-Surface-Tension Fluids on Bacterial Penetration of 0.2 Micron-Rated Filters during Process-Specific Filter Validation Testing.
    Folmsbee M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25868996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmarking of Sterilizing-Grade Filter Membranes with Liposome Filtration.
    Singh B; Mundlamuri R; Friese T; Mundrigi A; Handt S; Loewe T
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):223-235. PubMed ID: 29242392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing the Filtration of Liposomes Using Sterilizing-Grade Filters.
    Zourna K; Iwaniec A; Turner S; Jackson NB; Welsh JH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2021; 75(2):128-140. PubMed ID: 32999077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of membrane filtration for removal of diminutive bioburden organisms in pharmaceutical products and processes.
    Sundaram S; Auriemma M; Howard G; Brandwein H; Leo F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1999; 53(4):186-201. PubMed ID: 10754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of accurate microorganism identification in microbial challenge tests of membrane filters--part I.
    Kaesler I; Haake G; Hennig H; Rosenhagen A; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2011; 65(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 21502070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters.
    Haake G; Kaesler-Neumann I; Hennig H; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 22767883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Lewis M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):393-416. PubMed ID: 11766824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Development of a Microbial Challenge Test with Acholeplasma laidlawii To Rate Mycoplasma-Retentive Filters by Filter Manufacturers.
    Folmsbee M; Lentine KR; Wright C; Haake G; Mcburnie L; Ashtekar D; Beck B; Hutchison N; Okhio-Seaman L; Potts B; Pawar V; Windsor H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(3):281-96. PubMed ID: 25188349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part IV: Retention of hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) and Ralstonia pickettii (ATCC 700591) by 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Lewis M; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Larson B
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(3):150-71. PubMed ID: 12109335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 11310317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preuse/Poststerilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT): To Do or Not to Do?
    Gupta VS; Jindal J; Gupta A; Gupta NK
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 31732690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scale-up of Sterilizing-grade Membrane Filters from Discs to Pleated Cartridges: Effects of Operating Parameters and Solution Properties.
    Kumar A; Martin J; Kuriyel R
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 25691716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):346-72. PubMed ID: 11766822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of tubing material on the failure of product-specific bubble points of sterilizing-grade filters.
    Meyer BK; Vargas D
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2006; 60(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 17089693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified Bundle of Capillaries Approximation of Sterilizing Filter Membranes and its use for Filter Characterization and Filtration Process Optimization.
    Zakrewsky M; Hoopes P
    J Pharm Sci; 2022 Feb; 111(2):382-394. PubMed ID: 34600942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of sterilizing grade filtration.
    Jornitz MW; Meltzer TH
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2003; 113():65-9. PubMed ID: 14620854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Steves M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):373-92. PubMed ID: 11766823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical methods for the microbial validation of sterilizing-grade filters used in aseptic processing.
    MacDonald WD; Pelletier CA; Gasper DL
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 2689620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Quality by Design Approach to Microbial Retention Validation.
    Leahy A; Juneau J; Souza K; Miller C; Nguyen N; Lutz H; Kolhe P
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2023; 77(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 35840346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.