These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22494068)
1. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study. Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes. Eick S; Bender P; Flury S; Lussi A; Sculean A Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 22526889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces: a SEM study. Tsurumaki Jdo N; Souto BH; Oliveira GJ; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio Júnior E; Marcantonio RA Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 21915514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic and rotary instruments: an in vitro study using scanning electron microscopy. Marda P; Prakash S; Devaraj CG; Vastardis S Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22945704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of the root surface microtopography following the use of two polishing systems by Confocal Microscopy (CFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Solís Moreno C; Sanz-Moliner JD; Pascual La Rocca A; Nart J; Santos Alemany A Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Dec; 12(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 24390023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study. Schlageter L; Rateitschak-Plüss EM; Schwarz JP J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 8783052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro. Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study. Maritato M; Orazi L; Laurito D; Formisano G; Serra E; Lollobrigida M; Molinari A; De Biase A Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study. Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments. Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods. Vigolo P; Motterle M J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study. Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments. Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diamond burs versus curettes in root planing: a randomized clinical trial. Türktekin F; Buduneli N; Lappin DF; Türk T; Buduneli E Aust Dent J; 2018 Jun; 63(2):242-252. PubMed ID: 29432640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement. Dassatti L; Manicone PF; Lauricella S; Pastorino R; Filetici P; Nicoletti F; D'Addona A Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 6(4):470-477. PubMed ID: 32573120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root surface removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments: an in vitro and SEM study. Lavespere JE; Yukna RA; Rice DA; LeBlanc DM J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1281-7. PubMed ID: 8997674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips. Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: A randomized clinical trial. Puglisi R; Santos A; Pujol A; Ferrari M; Nart J; Pascual A Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):328-338. PubMed ID: 34018671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]