These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22494081)

  • 1. SMART, SMARTER, SMARTEST: the influence of peer groups compared to practice visits on the quality of action plans.
    van Es JM; Visser MR; Wieringa-De Waard M
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(8):e582-8. PubMed ID: 22494081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do GP trainers use feedback in drawing up their Personal Development Plans (PDPs)? Results from a quantitative study.
    van Es JM; Visser MR; Wieringa-de Waard M
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(11):e718-24. PubMed ID: 22494080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving access to primary care: the impact of a quality-improvement strategy.
    Kirschner K; Braspenning J; Maassen I; Bonte A; Burgers J; Grol R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2010 Jun; 19(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 20427305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study.
    Overeem K; Wollersheim H; Driessen E; Lombarts K; van de Ven G; Grol R; Arah O
    Med Educ; 2009 Sep; 43(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 19709012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training the trainer in general practice: the perceived value of independent peer feedback for learning activities.
    Shepherd A; McKay J; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Nov; 21(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 21144175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Peer feedback for trainers in general practice].
    Damoiseaux RA; Truijens L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2016; 160():D268. PubMed ID: 27334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teaching.
    Boerboom TB; Jaarsma D; Dolmans DH; Scherpbier AJ; Mastenbroek NJ; Van Beukelen P
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(11):e615-23. PubMed ID: 22022915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflection as a component of formative assessment appears to be instrumental in promoting the use of feedback; an observational study.
    Pelgrim EA; Kramer AW; Mokkink HG; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2013 Sep; 35(9):772-8. PubMed ID: 23808841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involvement of general practitioners in managing alcohol problems: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored improvement programme.
    van Beurden I; Anderson P; Akkermans RP; Grol RP; Wensing M; Laurant MG
    Addiction; 2012 Sep; 107(9):1601-11. PubMed ID: 22372573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial.
    Perera J; Mohamadou G; Kaur S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality improvement in clinical teaching through student evaluations of rotations and feedback to departments.
    Lewisson N; Hellgren L; Johansson J
    Med Teach; 2013 Oct; 35(10):820-5. PubMed ID: 23796029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing the EBM behaviour of GP trainers: a mixed method study.
    Te Pas E; van Dijk N; Bartelink ME; Wieringa-De Waard M
    Med Teach; 2013; 35(3):e990-7. PubMed ID: 23102157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted feedback program to improve the quality of intensive care by using quality indicators.
    de Vos Maartje LG; van der Veer SN; Graafmans WC; de Keizer NF; Jager KJ; Westert GP; van der Voort PH
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Mar; 22(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 23362504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.
    McKay J; Pope L; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 19239594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Educational expectations of GP trainers. A EURACT needs analysis.
    Guldal D; Windak A; Maagaard R; Allen J; Kjaer NK
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2012 Dec; 18(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 22937884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of peer review in nursing education and clinical practice.
    Boehm H; Bonnel W
    J Nurses Staff Dev; 2010; 26(3):108-15. PubMed ID: 20508425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users.
    Kirschner K; Braspenning J; Akkermans RP; Jacobs JE; Grol R
    Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 22997223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medication reviews in the community: results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial.
    Sorensen L; Stokes JA; Purdie DM; Woodward M; Elliott R; Roberts MS
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Dec; 58(6):648-64. PubMed ID: 15563363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-management plans for asthma control and predictors of patient compliance.
    Kaya Z; Erkan F; Ozkan M; Ozkan S; Kocaman N; Ertekin BA; Direk N
    J Asthma; 2009 Apr; 46(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 19373635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing the general level of academic capacity in general practice: introducing mandatory research training for general practitioner trainees through a participatory research process.
    Tulinius C; Nielsen AB; Hansen LJ; Hermann C; Vlasova L; Dalsted R
    Qual Prim Care; 2012; 20(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 22584368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.