63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22494343)
21. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women.
Lawson HW; Henson R; Bobo JK; Kaeser MK
MMWR Recomm Rep; 2000 Mar; 49(RR-2):37-55. PubMed ID: 15580731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pap smear screening and invasive cervical cancer.
Brown RK; Barker WH
J Fam Pract; 1982 Nov; 15(5):875-9. PubMed ID: 7130915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Spence AR; Goggin P; Franco EL
Prev Med; 2007; 45(2-3):93-106. PubMed ID: 17651792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interval cancer audit and disclosure in breast screening programmes: An international survey.
Fitzpatrick P; Byrne H; Flanagan F; O'Doherty A; Connors A; Larke A; O'Laoide R; Williams Y; Mooney T
J Med Screen; 2023 Mar; 30(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 36071637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed.
Morell ND; Taylor JR; Snyder RN; Ziel HK; Saltz A; Willie S
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7088449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The invasive cervical cancer review: psychological issues surrounding disclosure.
Sherman SM; Moss E; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 23506198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The NHS cervical screening programme audit of invasive cervical cancers: who benefits?
Moss EL; Sherman SM; Pearmain P; Redman CW
BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21985445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comprehensive evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs: the case of Colombia.
Murillo R; Wiesner C; Cendales R; Piñeros M; Tovar S
Salud Publica Mex; 2011; 53(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 22282139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Management of microinvasive cervical cancer: a British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology audit.
Cairns M; Tidy J; Cruickshank ME
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Oct; 16(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 22659775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Why do women still develop cancer of the cervix despite the existence of a national screening programme?
Brinkmann D; Gladman MA; Norman S; Lawton FG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Mar; 119(1):123-4. PubMed ID: 15734097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Elderly women above screening age diagnosed with cervical cancer have a worse prognosis.
Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Widén E; Kannisto P
Anticancer Res; 2014 Sep; 34(9):5147-51. PubMed ID: 25202106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A new method for the classification of invasive cervical cancer screening histories.
Bagnall H; Pearmain P; Clare J; Lawrence G
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 17007655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical cancer screening among Sudanese women.
Hassan FM; Khirelseed M
Gulf J Oncolog; 2009 Jul; (6):28-34. PubMed ID: 20194088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
