63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22494343)
41. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Stage IV Cervical Cancer in a Patient Compliant With Current Management Guidelines for Abnormal Cytology: A Case Report.
Mazul J; Perkins RB
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Oct; 21(4):e40-e41. PubMed ID: 28953130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Evaluation of mortality after the analysis of the screening history in women diagnosed with infiltrating cervical cancer].
Castillo M; Astudillo A; Clavero O; Velasco J; Ibáñez R; de Sanjosé S
Aten Primaria; 2018 Mar; 50(3):151-158. PubMed ID: 28629884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Genome-wide screening of DNA copy number alterations in cervical carcinoma patients with CGH+SNP microarrays and HPV-FISH.
Kuglik P; Smetana J; Vallova V; Moukova L; Kasikova K; Cvanova M; Brozova L
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(8):5071-82. PubMed ID: 25197380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Implementing the national invasive cervical cancer audit: a local perspective.
Moss EL; Pearmain P; Askew S; Owen G; Reynolds TM; Prabakar IM; Douce G; Parkes J; Menon V; Todd RW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2010 Oct; 117(11):1411-6. PubMed ID: 20716252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Disclosing the results of the invasive cervical cancer review to patients: a survey of lead colposcopists across England.
Sherman SM; Nailer E; Pearmain P; Todd RW; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2016 Aug; 27(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 26566859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Review of invasive cervical cancers and uptake of disclosure of results: an audit of procedures and response.
Prabakar I; Moss EL; Douce G; Parkes J; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2012 Jun; 23(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 22494343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Spence AR; Goggin P; Franco EL
Prev Med; 2007; 45(2-3):93-106. PubMed ID: 17651792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The invasive cervical cancer review: psychological issues surrounding disclosure.
Sherman SM; Moss E; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 23506198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
