These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22494365)

  • 1. QRS pattern and improvement in right and left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a radionuclide study.
    Domenichini G; Burri H; Valzania C; Gavaruzzi G; Fallani F; Biffi M; Sunthorn H; Diemberger I; Martignani C; Foulkes H; Fleury E; Boriani G
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2012 Apr; 12():27. PubMed ID: 22494365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scar burden, not intraventricular conduction delay pattern, is associated with outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Adelstein EC; Althouse AD; Schwartzman D; Jain SK; Soman P; Saba S
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1664-1672. PubMed ID: 29852239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship of QRS morphology and mechanical dyssynchrony to long-term outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Hara H; Oyenuga OA; Tanaka H; Adelstein EC; Onishi T; McNamara DM; Schwartzman D; Saba S; Gorcsan J
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Nov; 33(21):2680-91. PubMed ID: 22351700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Greater response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with true complete left bundle branch block: a PREDICT substudy.
    Perrin MJ; Green MS; Redpath CJ; Nery PB; Keren A; Beanlands RS; Birnie DH
    Europace; 2012 May; 14(5):690-5. PubMed ID: 22170897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. True complete left bundle branch block morphology strongly predicts good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Tian Y; Zhang P; Li X; Gao Y; Zhu T; Wang L; Li D; Wang J; Yuan C; Guo J
    Europace; 2013 Oct; 15(10):1499-506. PubMed ID: 23468351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by real-time electrocardiographic imaging for patients with non-left bundle branch block.
    Tam MTK; Au ACK; Chan JYS; Chan CP; Cheung LL; Cheng YW; Yuen FSM; Yan BP
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Jul; 21(7):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 38369037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Friedman DJ; Al-Khatib SM; Dalgaard F; Fudim M; Abraham WT; Cleland JGF; Curtis AB; Gold MR; Kutyifa V; Linde C; Tang AS; Ali-Ahmed F; Olivas-Martinez A; Inoue LYT; Sanders GD
    Circulation; 2023 Mar; 147(10):812-823. PubMed ID: 36700426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. QRS axis and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure enrolled in MADIT-CRT.
    Brenyo A; Rao M; Barsheshet A; Cannom D; Quesada A; McNitt S; Huang DT; Moss AJ; Zareba W
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 23252875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a non-left bundle branch block morphology.
    Rickard J; Bassiouny M; Cronin EM; Martin DO; Varma N; Niebauer MJ; Tchou PJ; Tang WH; Wilkoff BL
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1576-80. PubMed ID: 21890086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relation of QRS Duration to Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.
    Sassone B; Bertini M; Beltrami M; Malagù M; Pasanisi G; Kuwornu HA; Avigni N; Fucà G; Pacchioni F; Minarelli M; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Padeletti L
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 119(11):1803-1808. PubMed ID: 28391991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New-onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction response to guideline-directed therapies: The NEOLITH study.
    Wang NC; Singh M; Adelstein EC; Jain SK; Mendenhall GS; Shalaby AA; Voigt AH; Saba S
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Apr; 13(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 26688064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Wang Y; Zhu H; Hou X; Wang Z; Zou F; Qian Z; Wei Y; Wang X; Zhang L; Li X; Liu Z; Xue S; Qin C; Zeng J; Li H; Wu H; Ma H; Ellenbogen KA; Gold MR; Fan X; Zou J;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 80(13):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 36137670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prominent R wave in ECG lead V1 predicts improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with or without left bundle branch block.
    Bode WD; Bode MF; Gettes L; Jensen BC; Mounsey JP; Chung EH
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Oct; 12(10):2141-7. PubMed ID: 26048194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.
    Kosztin A; Kutyifa V; Nagy VK; Geller L; Zima E; Molnar L; Szilagyi S; Ozcan EE; Szeplaki G; Merkely B
    Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 26116830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of left ventricular torsion and strain with biventricular pacing in patients with underlying right bundle branch block versus those with left bundle branch block.
    De S; Popović ZB; Verhaert D; Dresing T; Wilkoff B; Starling R; Tang WH; Thomas JD; Grimm RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 115(7):918-23. PubMed ID: 25779616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender, underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block in heart failure.
    Linde C; Ståhlberg M; Benson L; Braunschweig F; Edner M; Dahlström U; Alehagen U; Lund LH
    Europace; 2015 Mar; 17(3):424-31. PubMed ID: 25164429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of QRS complex duration and morphology on left ventricular reverse remodelling and left ventricular function improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    van der Bijl P; Khidir M; Leung M; Mertens B; Ajmone Marsan N; Delgado V; Bax JJ
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 28176418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preimplantation interlead ECG heterogeneity is superior to QRS complex duration in predicting mechanical super-response in patients with non-left bundle branch block receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bortolotto AL; Verrier RL; Nearing BD; Marum AA; Araujo Silva B; Pedreira GC; Tessarolo Silva F; Medeiros SA; Sroubek J; Zimetbaum PJ; Chang JD
    Heart Rhythm; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1887-1896. PubMed ID: 32497764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ECG parameters predict left ventricular conduction delay in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
    Pastore G; Maines M; Marcantoni L; Zanon F; Noventa F; Corbucci G; Baracca E; Aggio S; Picariello C; Lanza D; Rigatelli G; Carraro M; Roncon L; Barold SS
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Dec; 13(12):2289-2296. PubMed ID: 27424074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.
    Guo J; Li L; Xiao G; Ye T; Huang X; Meng F; Li Q; Chen S; Cai B
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1460-1468. PubMed ID: 32960993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.