BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22494405)

  • 21. Laboratory comparison of vacuum, OSHA, and HUD sampling methods for lead in household dust.
    Reynolds SJ; Etre L; Thorne PS; Whitten P; Selim M; Popendorf WJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 9183838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cleaning efficacy of high-efficiency particulate air-filtered vacuuming and "dry steam" cleaning on carpet.
    Yiin LM; Yu CH; Ashley P; Rhoads G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 18075882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Achieving dust lead clearance standards after lead hazard control projects: an evaluation of the HUD-recommended cleaning procedure and an abbreviated alternative.
    Dixon S; Tohn E; Rupp R; Clark S
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 May; 14(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 10446486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Occupational exposure of poultry stockmen in current barn systems for egg production in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte RT
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 12195795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Occupational exposures to styrene vapor in a manufacturing plant for fiber-reinforced composite wind turbine blades.
    Hammond D; Garcia A; Feng HA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 21597049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of four sampling methods for determining exposure of children to lead-contaminated household dust.
    Sterling DA; Roegner KC; Lewis RD; Luke DA; Wilder LC; Burchette SM
    Environ Res; 1999 Aug; 81(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 10433844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A survey of spatially distributed exterior dust lead loadings in New York City.
    Caravanos J; Weiss AL; Blaise MJ; Jaeger RJ
    Environ Res; 2006 Feb; 100(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 16005864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selecting a lead hazard control strategy based on dust lead loading and housing condition: II. Application of Housing Assessment Tool (HAT) modeling results.
    Breysse J; Dixon S; Wilson J; Kawecki C; Green R; Phoenix J; Galke W; Clark S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Aug; 5(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 18569521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exposures of preschool children to chlorpyrifos and its degradation product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in their everyday environments.
    Morgan MK; Sheldon LS; Croghan CW; Jones PA; Robertson GL; Chuang JC; Wilson NK; Lyu CW
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 15(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 15367928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
    Harper M; Pacolay B
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Residential dust lead loading immediately after intervention in the HUD lead hazard control grant program.
    Dixon SL; Wilson JW; Succop PA; Chen M; Galke WA; Menrath W; Clark CS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Nov; 1(11):716-24. PubMed ID: 15673092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An investigation into porch dust lead levels.
    Wilson J; Dixon SL; Jacobs DE; Akoto J; Korfmacher KS; Breysse J
    Environ Res; 2015 Feb; 137():129-35. PubMed ID: 25531817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lead in house dust: relationships between exposure metrics.
    Adgate JL; Weisel C; Wang Y; Rhoads GG; Lioy PJ
    Environ Res; 1995 Aug; 70(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 8674482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of worker lead exposures and cleaning effectiveness during removal of deteriorated lead-based paint.
    Sussell A; Hart C; Wild D; Ashley K
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 Mar; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10453632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effectiveness of a home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures.
    Lioy PJ; Yiin LM; Adgate J; Weisel C; Rhoads GG
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 9470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lead exposures during shipboard chipping and grinding paint-removal operations.
    Zedd HC; Walker YP; Hernandez JE; Thomas RJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):392-6. PubMed ID: 8362760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A side-by-side comparison of dust collection methods for sampling lead-contaminated house dust.
    Lanphear BP; Emond M; Jacobs DE; Weitzman M; Tanner M; Winter NL; Yakir B; Eberly S
    Environ Res; 1995 Feb; 68(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 7601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of HUD-funded lead hazard control treatments at 6 years post-intervention.
    Wilson J; Pivetz T; Ashley P; Jacobs D; Strauss W; Menkedick J; Dixon S; Tsai HC; Brown V; Friedman W; Warren Galke ; Clark S
    Environ Res; 2006 Oct; 102(2):237-48. PubMed ID: 16740256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.