These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2249470)

  • 41. [Detection of complex chromosomal aberrations in patients with multiple myeloma using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization].
    Jiang YQ; Chen LJ; Zhu Y; Qiu HR; Wang R; Xu JR; Lu H; Li JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 27(4):441-4. PubMed ID: 20677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prenatal detection and characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 22 with apparently normal phenotype.
    Lin CC; Hsieh YY; Wang CH; Li YC; Hsieh LJ; Lee CC; Tsai CH; Tsai FJ
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 16915592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Molecular identification of a small supernumerary marker chromosome by in situ hybridization: diagnosis of an isochromosome 18p with probe L1.84.
    Blennow E; Nielsen KB
    Clin Genet; 1991 Jun; 39(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 1863990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Non-radioactive in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific probes].
    Bryndorf TE; Christensen B; Philip J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(21):1487-91. PubMed ID: 1598719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Identification of recurrent chromosomal breakpoints in multiple myeloma with complex karyotypes by combined G-banding, spectral karyotyping, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses.
    Sáez B; Martín-Subero JI; Largo C; Martín MC; Odero MD; Prosper F; Siebert R; Calasanz MJ; Cigudosa JC
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Sep; 169(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 16938572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Structural unbalanced chromosome rearrangements resolved by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Daniely M; Barkai G; Goldman B; Aviram-Goldring A
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 86(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 10516433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cytogenetic heterogeneity and their serial dynamic changes during acquisition of cytogenetic aberrations in cultured mesenchymal stem cells.
    Kim JA; Im KO; Park SN; Kwon JS; Kim SY; Oh K; Lee DS; Kim MK; Kim SW; Jang M; Lee G; Oh YM; Lee SD; Lee DS
    Mutat Res; 2015 Jul; 777():60-8. PubMed ID: 25974687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combined karyotyping, CGH and M-FISH analysis allows detailed characterization of unidentified chromosomal rearrangements in Merkel cell carcinoma.
    Van Gele M; Leonard JH; Van Roy N; Van Limbergen H; Van Belle S; Cocquyt V; Salwen H; De Paepe A; Speleman F
    Int J Cancer; 2002 Sep; 101(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 12209990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An improved method for chromosome banding after fluorescence in situ hybridization: use of a tetramethylrhodhamine-conjugated BrdU antibody.
    De Sario A; De Carli L; Raimondi E
    Cytotechnology; 1991 Sep; 7(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1367701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Karyotypic evolution pathways in medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor determined with a combination of spectral karyotyping, G-banding, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Cohen N; Betts DR; Tavori U; Toren A; Ram T; Constantini S; Grotzer MA; Amariglio N; Rechavi G; Trakhtenbrot L
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Feb; 149(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 15104282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In situ hybridization analysis of isodicentric X-chromosomes with short arm fusion.
    Koch JE; Kølvraa S; Hertz JM; Rasmussen K; Gregersen N; Fly GF; Bolund LA
    Clin Genet; 1990 Jun; 37(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 2383931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Chromosomal aberrations evaluated by CGH, FISH and GTG-banding in a case of AIDS-related Burkitt's lymphoma.
    Zunino A; Viaggi S; Ottaggio L; Fronza G; Schenone A; Roncella S; Abbondandolo A
    Haematologica; 2000 Mar; 85(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 10702812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fresh and aged human lymphocyte metaphase slides are equally usable for GTG banding.
    Sajjad N; Haque S; SBurney SI; Shahid SM; Zehra S; Azhar A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2014 Sep; 27(5):1255-9. PubMed ID: 25176363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations using in situ hybridization in paraffin sections of routinely processed bladder cancers.
    Hopman AH; van Hooren E; van de Kaa CA; Vooijs PG; Ramaekers FC
    Mod Pathol; 1991 Jul; 4(4):503-13. PubMed ID: 1924281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Flow cytogenetics.
    Bartholdi MF
    Pathobiology; 1990; 58(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 1694434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Combined spectral karyotyping and DAPI banding analysis of chromosome abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndrome.
    Kakazu N; Taniwaki M; Horiike S; Nishida K; Tatekawa T; Nagai M; Takahashi T; Akaogi T; Inazawa J; Ohki M; Abe T
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Dec; 26(4):336-45. PubMed ID: 10534769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Two novel in vitro human hepatoblastoma models, HepU1 and HepU2, are highly characteristic of fetal-embryonal differentiation in hepatoblastoma.
    Scheil S; Hagen S; Brüderlein S; Leuschner I; Behnisch W; Möller P
    Int J Cancer; 2003 Jun; 105(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 12704668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Combined spectral karyotyping, multicolor banding, and microarray comparative genomic hybridization analysis provides a detailed characterization of complex structural chromosomal rearrangements associated with gene amplification in the osteosarcoma cell line MG-63.
    Lim G; Karaskova J; Vukovic B; Bayani J; Beheshti B; Bernardini M; Squire JA; Zielenska M
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Sep; 153(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 15350306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.
    Van Dekken H; Krijtenburg PJ; Alers JC
    Acta Histochem; 2000 Feb; 102(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 10726167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Ovarian cancer--assessment of methods for cytogenetic analysis and chromosome aberrations found in ovarian cancer].
    Tanaka K
    Rinsho Byori; 1989 Feb; Spec No 80():268-80. PubMed ID: 2630676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.