201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22495747)
1. Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles.
Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 22495747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LISE: a server using ligand-interacting and site-enriched protein triangles for prediction of ligand-binding sites.
Xie ZR; Liu CK; Hsiao FC; Yao A; Hwang MJ
Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W292-6. PubMed ID: 23609546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.
Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B
Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
Laurie AT; Jackson RM
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
Huang B
OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
Xie ZR; Hwang MJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():383-98. PubMed ID: 25330972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free resources to assist structure-based virtual ligand screening experiments.
Villoutreix BO; Renault N; Lagorce D; Sperandio O; Montes M; Miteva MA
Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2007 Aug; 8(4):381-411. PubMed ID: 17696871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding.
Wierbowski SD; Wingert BM; Zheng J; Camacho CJ
Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 31721338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MEDock: a web server for efficient prediction of ligand binding sites based on a novel optimization algorithm.
Chang DT; Oyang YJ; Lin JH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jul; 33(Web Server issue):W233-8. PubMed ID: 15991337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ProMateus--an open research approach to protein-binding sites analysis.
Neuvirth H; Heinemann U; Birnbaum D; Tishby N; Schreiber G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W543-8. PubMed ID: 17488838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A web server for analysis, comparison and prediction of protein ligand binding sites.
Singh H; Srivastava HK; Raghava GP
Biol Direct; 2016 Mar; 11(1):14. PubMed ID: 27016210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. COACH-D: improved protein-ligand binding sites prediction with refined ligand-binding poses through molecular docking.
Wu Q; Peng Z; Zhang Y; Yang J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W438-W442. PubMed ID: 29846643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. HingeProt: automated prediction of hinges in protein structures.
Emekli U; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R; Haliloglu T
Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1219-27. PubMed ID: 17847101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can We Rely on Computational Predictions To Correctly Identify Ligand Binding Sites on Novel Protein Drug Targets? Assessment of Binding Site Prediction Methods and a Protocol for Validation of Predicted Binding Sites.
Broomhead NK; Soliman ME
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2017 Mar; 75(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 27796788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Sequence-Based Dynamic Ensemble Learning System for Protein Ligand-Binding Site Prediction.
Chen P; Hu S; Zhang J; Gao X; Li J; Xia J; Wang B
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(5):901-912. PubMed ID: 26661785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
