200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22495747)
21. Designing template-free predictor for targeting protein-ligand binding sites with classifier ensemble and spatial clustering.
Yu DJ; Hu J; Yang J; Shen HB; Tang J; Yang JY
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(4):994-1008. PubMed ID: 24334392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automatic generation of bioinformatics tools for predicting protein-ligand binding sites.
Komiyama Y; Banno M; Ueki K; Saad G; Shimizu K
Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 26545824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. G-LoSA for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites and Structures.
Lee HS; Im W
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1611():97-108. PubMed ID: 28451974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. PESDserv: a server for high-throughput comparison of protein binding site surfaces.
Das S; Krein MP; Breneman CM
Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 26(15):1913-4. PubMed ID: 20538727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction-from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atoms.
Ravindranath PA; Sanner MF
Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(20):3142-3149. PubMed ID: 27354702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.
Brylinski M; Skolnick J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18165317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.
Brylinski M; Lee SY; Zhou H; Skolnick J
J Struct Biol; 2011 Mar; 173(3):558-69. PubMed ID: 20850544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. PocketDepth: a new depth based algorithm for identification of ligand binding sites in proteins.
Kalidas Y; Chandra N
J Struct Biol; 2008 Jan; 161(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17949996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Protein-binding site prediction based on three-dimensional protein modeling.
Oh M; Joo K; Lee J
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():152-6. PubMed ID: 19768678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms.
Hetényi C; van der Spoel D
Protein Sci; 2011 May; 20(5):880-93. PubMed ID: 21413095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Protein-ligand binding region prediction (PLB-SAVE) based on geometric features and CUDA acceleration.
Lo YT; Wang HW; Pai TW; Tzou WS; Hsu HH; Chang HT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4. PubMed ID: 23514235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation.
Huang B; Schroeder M
BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Sep; 6():19. PubMed ID: 16995956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. eF-seek: prediction of the functional sites of proteins by searching for similar electrostatic potential and molecular surface shape.
Kinoshita K; Murakami Y; Nakamura H
Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W398-402. PubMed ID: 17567616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.
Heo L; Shin WH; Lee MS; Seok C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W210-4. PubMed ID: 24753427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the performance of the PLB index for ligand-binding site prediction using dihedral angles and the solvent-accessible surface area.
Cao C; Xu S
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33232. PubMed ID: 27619067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MSPocket: an orientation-independent algorithm for the detection of ligand binding pockets.
Zhu H; Pisabarro MT
Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 27(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 21134896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
