These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22495809)

  • 1. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Eldridge S; Graff M; de Hoop E; Borm GF
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2169-78. PubMed ID: 22495809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MK; Thomson S; Ramsay CR; MacLennan GS; Grimshaw JM
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Mar; 34(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 14972631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression.
    Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1488-501. PubMed ID: 20101669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
    Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MSurvPow: a FORTRAN program to calculate the sample size and power for cluster-randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes.
    Gao F; Manatunga AK; Chen S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Apr; 78(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15780890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
    Klar N; Darlington G
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    You Z; Williams OD; Aban I; Kabagambe EK; Tiwari HK; Cutter G
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21163852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
    Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
    Nixon RM; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials.
    Woertman W; de Hoop E; Moerbeek M; Zuidema SU; Gerritsen DL; Teerenstra S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):752-8. PubMed ID: 23523551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability, effect size, and responsiveness of health status measures in the design of randomized and cluster-randomized trials.
    Diehr P; Chen L; Patrick D; Feng Z; Yasui Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15837452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size in cluster-randomized trials with time to event as the primary endpoint.
    Jahn-Eimermacher A; Ingel K; Schneider A
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(5):739-51. PubMed ID: 22865817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials.
    Giraudeau B; Ravaud P; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(27):5578-85. PubMed ID: 18646266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.