136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22497228)
1. The reliability of assessing rotation of teeth on photographed study casts.
Vermeulen FM; Aartman IH; Kuitert R; Zentner A
Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1033-9. PubMed ID: 22497228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
Schirmer UR; Wiltshire WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 9423701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.
Morphett AL; Crawford CM; Lee D
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12704307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
Normando D; da Silva PL; Mendes ÁM
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of multiple-degree incisal/occlusal tooth wear assessment on dental casts: findings from a fiveexaminer investigation and related clinical implications.
Paesani DA; Guarda-Nardini L; Gelos C; Salmaso L; Manfredini D
Quintessence Int; 2014 Mar; 45(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 24570994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.
Quimby ML; Vig KW; Rashid RG; Firestone AR
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 15264638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between stone and digital cast measurements in mixed dentition : Validity, reliability, reproducibility, and objectivity.
Schieffer L; Latzko L; Ulmer H; Schenz-Spisic N; Lepperdinger U; Paulus M; Crismani AG
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):75-84. PubMed ID: 35238945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of probing depth assessments at healthy implant sites and natural teeth.
Ramanauskaite A; Obreja K; Schwarz F; Jepsen K; Cosgarea R; Bunke J; Eisenbeiss AK; Schulz J; Flörke C; Eberhard C; Kocher T; Jablonowski L; Jepsen S; Holtfreter B
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2533-2545. PubMed ID: 36462039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability of intraoral malocclusion assessment.
Ovsenik M; Farcnik F; Verdenik I
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 17290020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-generated study of the correlation between tooth, face, arch forms, and palatal contour.
Sellen PN; Jagger DC; Harrison A
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 9710817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of 2 methods in maxillary transverse deficiency diagnosis.
Zhang CX; Tan XM; Wu W; Liu H; Liu Y; Qu XR; Liu DX
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jun; 159(6):758-765. PubMed ID: 33722409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
